www.UfoQuest4Truth.com

UFO WAARNEMINGEN WEBSITE
Top rated
august212005Wiltshire.jpg
Egyptian winged Scarabee, in Sumerie: Nibiru, the 12th Planet - August 21, 2005 - Wiltshire, UK279 viewsNi.bi.ru. - winged planet, sign Alpha and the horned bull.
(3 votes)
24july2005Wiltshire.jpg
"APEX" 24 juli 2005 Wiltshire - UK301 viewsAncient sumerian anunna nibirian universal symbols in cropcircles.

Know thyself. ? Socrates

(3 votes)
UranusMoonMirandaStructures.JPG
Miranda, the Moon of Uranus with artificial structures on the surface?227 views
(3 votes)
MarsFACE-Pyramides450.000yearsago.JPG
445.000 years ago Cydonia Area; Mars pyramides and the Face of Mars208 views*both were built 450.000 years ago by the Anunnakies [Igigi later] (on Mars, according Z. Sitchin.
(3 votes)
bookofJobandAmos.JPG
Book of Job and Amos224 views
(3 votes)
Tempel-Inanna.JPG
Zecharia Sitchin, discoverer of the 10th planet; Nibiru216 views
(3 votes)
445.000yearsago.JPG
445.000 years ago251 views445.000 jaren geleden; De Nefilim, aangevoerd door Enki, komen aan op de aarde vanaf de Twaalfde Planeet, Eridu - Aarde station I - wordt in zuidelijk Mesopotamie (nu Irak) gevestigd.
*From the 12th Planet, Z. Sitchin.

(3 votes)
maryufo1449-1494~1.jpg
1449 AD-1494 AD , Mary and a UFO..308 views
(3 votes)
maria-1.jpg
233 viewsOnze Lieve BeschermVrouwe..
(3 votes)
MountRainierWashington.jpg
Mount Rainier Washington205 views
(3 votes)
ufoclouds1420~0.jpg
Ufo in clouds - 1420 AD283 views
(3 votes)
lolladoffplate.jpg
7000 BC, Lolladofplate, Nepal319 views
(3 votes)
akkad3.jpg
Sumerian Claytablet; 2.500 BC - Seal VA-243 , Berlin Museum313 viewsThe Epic of Ceation (Enuma Elish) and other relevant Sumerian texts are supported by other pictorial depictions, such as the cylinder seal VA-243 in the Berlin Museum. It shows the Sun in the centre, surrounded by eleven orbiting bodies that include the Moon, Pluto and yet to be recognized "Planet X" -- Nibiru.
(3 votes)
6000BCTassiliNAfrica.jpg
281 views
(3 votes)
UFO REMOTE CONTROL.jpg
UFO Remote Control213 views
(3 votes)
imagesCARCEDGV.jpg
194 views
(3 votes)
imagesCAPEEZC3.jpg
Alien in Area 51195 views
(3 votes)
imagesCA9G64FK.jpg
204 views
(3 votes)
imagesCA2W5MI1.jpg
197 views
(3 votes)
315~0.jpg
Hanebu - Alien Civilization among us176 viewsUFOs are here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMqdEK3qYHU&feature=related (5:07)
(3 votes)
sti-vid1.jpg
Save the Internet!286 views"Independence Day", Global Net Neutrality:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWt0XUocViE

(3 votes)
Array.jpg
HAARP High Freq Active Auroral Research, Gakona - Alaska 273 views"What is really happening on the North Pole?!"

www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF2Rq5rCwHg&NR (10min07sec)

The HAARP Research Station is located approximately 8 miles north of Gakona, Alaska - North Pole

(3 votes)
MergedOrbsRussia.JPG
UFOs Merge during Russian MiG Chase Tags320 viewssecret aviation- military drones uav ufo space high speed aurora?
(3 votes)
orbsrussia.JPG
UFOs Merge during Russian MiG Chase Tags315 viewssecret military drones uav ufo space high speed aurora?
www.video.google.com/videplay?docid=-5210326345538570434

(3 votes)
SuperEarths.jpg
Om de ster Mu Arae, bevindt zich 'een Grote Broer van onze Aarde' op maar 50 lichtjaar!316 viewsEn tevens een Jupiter-achtige planeet om de ster Mu Ara in 2000 gevonden.
In 2002 vind men een 2e Gasreus en in Juni 2004 een nieuwe Rotsachtige planeet vlak bij de Ster met een orbit die een jaar van 9,5 dag ver binnen die Mercurius om onze eigen zon beschrijft; met een massa van 14 keer die van onze Aarde, dus de grootte van onze planeet Uranus, maar rotsachtig en 'Aarde-Gelijkend', volgens de onderzoekers van 'het European Southern Observatory'. Dat laat nog maar een mogelijkheid over: een rotsachtige planeet met een dikke atmosfeer. Moeten we de exoplaneet rond Mu Arae misschien een 'Hete Aarde' noemen?
[Mu is in het sumerisch "Sky Chamber/UFO" en ARae is de naam van de godheid RA/Marduk.
M.a.w.: The Golden Sky Chamber of the god Amon RA]

ESO-Dossierkennislink.nl [26/8/2004]
Grote Broer van onze Aarde inzicht: Stenen bolster, hete pit.
Mu Arae is een sterretje in het Zuidelijke Sterrenbeeld ARA [Altaar] op 50 lichtjaren afstand.
Voor sterrenkundigen is de ster een driedubbel lot uit de loterij. In 2000 vonden sterrenkundigen een Jupiter-achtige planeet om de ster. In 2002 bevestigden ze het vermoeden dat er een 2e Gasreus in een wijdere baan om de ster heen draaide. En nu, in juni 2004, voerden onderzoekers van het European Southern Observatory metingen uit die een 3e exolaneet aantonen. Deze nieuwste aanwinst van Mu Arae is maar 14 keer zo zwaar als de Aarde, precies op de grens tussen de Super-Aarde en de mini-Gasreus. De planeet en de ster draaien gezamelijk om een gemeenschappelijk zwaartepunt als 2 stijldansers. Omdat de ster die veel op onze Zon lijkt zoveel zwaarder is dan de planeet, beweegt de planeet het hardst van de twee, maar de beweging van de ster, die periodiek en ritmisch in- en uitkrimpt, is toch vast te stellen.
Mu Arae beweegt afwisselend van de aarde! en er weer naartoe.
Uranus is met zijn 14,5 aardmassa's ongeveer zo zwaar als de nieuwe planeet rond Mu Arae. Maar de HARPS (=High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher) onderzoekers denken dat de exoplaneet helemaal geen Gasreus is. De nieuwe planeet bevindt zich enorm dicht bij zijn zon-met een jaar van 9,5 dag ver binnen de baan die Mercurius om zijn eigen Zon beschrijft.
Dat laat nog maar een mogelijkheid over: een rotsachtige planeet met een dikke atmosfeer!
Moeten we de exoplaneet rond Mu Arae misschien een 'Hete Aarde' noemen?

9 April 2006

(3 votes)
NASA4.jpg
UFOs in space348 viewsUFOs using advanced anti-Gravity energy, anti-matter reactors with element 115 and ZPE? UFO Activity Around Earth:

Watch: www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXWrP8mItgI&NR

Test for Einstein's gravity speed theory: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2238452.stm



(3 votes)
utrecht5.jpg
Chemtrails Utrecht 7 maart 2005245 viewsGrote Spinnenwebben weven ze in de luchten.

Een Hopi Indianen profetie luidt: "Als De Grote Schoonmaak nadert, dan zullen er spinnenwebben aan de lucht geweven worden."
Volgens UfodeWaarheid.com ziet dat er naar uit als het zo doorgaat boven heel Nederland en overal ter wereld en alle grote streden en wij vragen ons werkelijk af waarom niemand dit opvalt???

(3 votes)
Cloudseeding.jpg
28-8-2006 16.20u264 viewsWelsbach Seeding Patent For global Warming: www.willthomas.net/Chemtrails/welsbach-seeding.pdf
(3 votes)
austria_steire_71_tn.JPG
Austria, Steire - 1971279 views
(7 votes)
Bolbliksem.jpg
Bolbliksem te Soestdijk op 25 augustus 2005 om 21.30u921 views
(15 votes)
chemsBaarn-hoogland-A_fort-Soest.JPG
7:58 AM - 5 Oktober 2007: Chemtrails over Baarn, Hoogland, Soest en Amersfoort...226 views..en gisteren (4 okt. 2007) omstreeks +/- 21.15u wederom 2 'Vliegende Sterren' van Baarn-Oost/Hoogland richting het Noorden zien vliegen - Getuige: Marc van Druten; WWW.UFODEWAARHEID.COM
(8 votes)
WashingtonDC1942Oct29.jpg
October 29, 1942 - Washington DC UFO197 views
(4 votes)
oregon030607www.mufon.comAnonymous.jpg
03/06/07, Oregon 225 viewswww.mufon.com

Scientists Teleport Two Different Objects: This claim was made by Professor Eugene Polzik and his team at the Niels Bohr Institute at Copenhagen University in Denmark. He said they had made a breakthrough by using both light and matter. Teleportation between two single atoms was done two years ago. The new experiment allows teleportation to be taken over longer distances because it involves light as the carrier of entanglement. They have performed entanglement, quantum measurement and quantum feedback. All three are necessary in teleporting quantum information from one site to another site.

Source: CNN.com, October 5, 2006

Triangular-shaped Flying Structure: On October 11, 2006 a huge triangular-shaped object with red flickering lights on its periphery was seen over Los Angeles. The object flew north from southeast of Torrance at 7:48 pm.

Source: MUFON CMS


(4 votes)
Marscropcircles.jpg
226 views
(4 votes)
sportufo.jpg
sport model502 views
(4 votes)
antigravity04_X33ALockheedMartin.jpg
Antigravity; Lockheed-Martin's X 33A2866 viewsColonel Donald Ware, USAF (ret.) told me that he had recently learned from a three-star General that the VentureStar X-33 has an electrogravitics (antigravity) system on board (6). This virtually assures that the unacknowledged military antigravity version, the X-33 A, must surely also have electrogravitics on board. It is possible that what I have called the X-33A is the Aurora craft which Dr. Wolf described...

Chemtrails Baarn - the Netherlands, June 2nd, 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5BQHe2ak4o

The International Space Station (ISS) March 17th, 2009 - Baarn, The Netherlands: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVC3ERtZxSk

CHEMTRAILS! BAARN - SOEST - AMERSFOORT, NEDERLAND - 22 APRIL 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCjtu-wC1og

IN THE END OF DAYS - THE EXCELLENT DRUM OF GOLDEN LIGHT WILL SHINE! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g_2M_J2d0c

(18 votes)
chemtr2.jpg
Chemtrails boven de Noordzee973 viewsAl deze foto's van chemtrails zijn gemaakt op 15 januari in 2006 op de Pier van Ijmuiden.
Het had die dag over geheel Nederland koud maar ZONNIG moeten zijn. Dat was het ook op de Pier van Ijmuiden totdat vanaf een uur of 16.00u er boven de Noordzee richting Engeland wel heel veel chem- en contrails aangebracht werden, de lucht werd oranje, grijs en geel, de Zon leek te verdubbelen en te vervagen en het werd steeds kouder. Niets meer van wat een stralende heldere zonnige namiddag had moeten zijn.

(10 votes)
robbiewilliams.jpg
Robbie Williams, from Artist/Music to UFOlogist, he spotted several UFOs from Childhood on to Popstar 516 viewsWanna Contact the Living ... : www.youtube.com/watch?v=byFtnHwlhm0

Angels Live: www.youtube.com/watch?v=K37aF1xPPNU&feature=related

FEEL - LIVE in Berlin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzOzOP5501g&feature=related

(5 votes)
marilyniii.jpg
Marilyn Monroe (born Norma Jeane Mortenson on June 1, 1926 - August 5, 1962), was a Golden Globe Award-winning American actress, singer, model and pop icon.328 viewswww.youtube.com/watch?v=8OBAghDT-Q0

Sherrie Lea Laird 'Meant 4 Me' (old demo, better quality on its way): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWR3gWukm1U&NR=1

(5 votes)
alienarea51a.jpg
Alien filmed in Area 51469 views
(5 votes)
alienchili2004.jpg
Alien - Chili 2004379 views
(5 votes)
SideScout.jpg
G.A.F. International/Adamsky Foundation. P.O. Box 1722 - Vista, CA 92085 - USA; SideScout484 viewswww.gafintl-adamski.com

*Permission granted by G.A.F. Intl who holds the Copyrights to www.ufodewaarheid.com for pubilcation on this website.

(5 votes)
logo65ds4o-alfa.jpg
Deepspace4.com - website of IZAKOVIC278 viewswww.deepspace4.com

www.deepspace4.com/pages/science/flayingtriangle/flayingtriangle3tr-3b.htm

(5 votes)
pyramid_mini.jpg
Zecharia Sichin: the 12th Planet242 viewswww.sitchin.com
(5 votes)
LockheedF-117AstealthfighterrecoveredETtechPenta.jpg
Lockheed F-117A Stealthfighter recovered ET-techPenta250 views
(6 votes)
dvdhp.jpg
456 viewswww.miraclemineral.org

This Breakthrough can save your life, or the life of a loved one. The answer to AIDS, hepatitis A,B and C, malaria, herpes, TB, most cancer and many more of mankind's worse diseases has been found. Many diseases are now easily controlled. More than 75,000 disease victims have been included in the field tests in Africa. Scientific clinical trials have been conducted in a prison in the country of Malawi, East Africa.


(8 votes)
tr3b_astra.jpg
TR3-B ASTRA Triangular Craft 1063 views
(8 votes)
chemtr3.jpg
16.00u 15 januari 2006: Chemtrails boven de Noordzee, vanaf de Pier van Ijmuiden825 viewsvoor foto's van King Air 200 en 350 met Wingtip Chemtrailssprayers voor Weermanipulatie.
Learjet 35A: 'cloud-seeding' en de vele onbekende militaire vliegtuigen en jets.
Zie: www.chemtrails.nl/map2/Het%20Laatste%20Oordeel.htm

Foto's en informatie van een 'wingtip generator, zoals deze gebruikt wordt bij het sproeien van zware metalen en aerosols met als doel Weersverandering.
Bovendien komen de zware metalen en chemicalien in water terecht, waardoor er vele volksziektes kunnen ontstaan en in de lucht ademhalingsproblemen veroorzaken.

(8 votes)
180px-Chemtrail-1-.jpg
Chemtrails WorldWide638 views ?We hold these truths to be self evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? - Thomas Jefferson

WhoAmI's ChemTrail Awareness, PUBLIC LAW 95-79 [P.L. 95-79] TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1520a. Restrictions On Use Of Human Subjects For Testing Of Chemical Or Biological Agents: http://chemtrailawareness.multiply.com/journal/item/46/PUBLIC_LAW_95-79_P.L._95-79_TITLE_50_CHAPTER_32_SECTION_1520

(9 votes)
Laurel & Hardy.jpg
1326 viewsOmegaradio.tk: http://sites.google.com/site/wwwomegaradiotk/Home/slapstick-movies
(12 votes)
125px-Greek_uc_omega.png
Ninhursag - Omega was the Ninhursag's symbol long before the creation of the Greek alphabet.378 viewsI am the Alpha & Omega..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninhursag

In the legend of Atrahasis, Ninhursag appears as Nintu/Mami, the womb-goddess. She is chosen by the gods to create humans in order to relieve the gods from their work of digging canals and farm labor. She shapes clay figurines mixed with the flesh and blood of a slain minor deity, and ten months later, humans are born. Later, when over-population becomes a problem, Ninhursag sees to it that one third of human pregnancies will not succeed. She also institutes celibacy among certain priestesses in order to help keep the population down.

In other creation texts, Ninmah/Ninhursag acts as a midwife, while the mother goddess Nammu, the primeval sea goddess, makes different kinds of human individuals from lumps of clay at a feast given by Enki to celebrate the creation of humankind.
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Ninhursag
n the legend of Enki and Ninhursag, Ninhursag bore a daughter named Ninsar ("Lady Greenery") to Enki, the god of wisdom and the fresh waters. Ninsar in turn bore Enki a daughter named Ninkurra. Ninkurra, then bore Enki a daughter named Uttu. On Ninhursag's advice, Uttu buried Enki's seed in the earth, whereupon eight plants sprung up?the very first plants on earth. Enki, seeing the plants, ate them, and became ill in eight organs of his body. Ninhursag cured him, taking the fertile plants into her own body and giving birth to eight more deities: Abu, Nintulla (Nintul), Ninsutu, Ninkasi, Nanshe (Nazi), Dazimua, Ninti, and Enshag (Enshagag).

(10 votes)
WorldUFODisclosureCampaign.jpg
397 viewshttp://www.worldufodisclosure.org/
(10 votes)
A12Avenger3.jpg
Triangle - A12 Avenger1170 viewsIn 1992 while working at a superconductor laboratory in Finland Dr. Eugene Podkletnov was constructing and experimenting with large rotating superconductor discs. During his experiments a colleague noticed a strange effect would disturb smoke above the ring. Tests confirmed a 2% reduction in the weight of objects suspended directly over the ring. The phenomenon was also observed on the floor above where they measured a significant drop in barometric pressure in the area of the room where the superconductor was spinning in the room beneath.
It was at this moment that Podkletnov first realized he was dealing with a Gravity Effect, and not just some EM interference.
NASA tried to replicate the experiment in 2002 without success, but they used a tiny superconductor in their experiment. The key, according to Podkletnov, is the 30cm radius of the superconductor. However, growing SC crystals this large is an art form in itself. Scientists are now considering the use of another type of Bose-Einstein condensate called a ?Super-Fluid? which flows with ZERO resistance. Plasmas are also being considered.

(10 votes)
UFO-LAREN26-10-2005origineel-mobieltelefoon.JPG
Originele foto: UFO - Laren, Nederland - 26-10-2005 ; Foto met mobiele telefoon (nec n410i) door Marc - Ufodewaarheid.com513 viewsadvanced EM antigravity propulsion systems using ZPE?
(10 votes)
Columbia.jpg
Chemtrails in subliminale boodschappen en de NWO.333 viewsPRISON PLANET FORUM: www.forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=369.80
(5 votes)
logo_gray.JPG
290 viewswww.amnesty.nl
(5 votes)
holes2.jpg
Chemtrails en H.A.A.R.P. of iets anders?- gaten ontstaan in het kunstmatig gefabriceerde wolkendek..eind juni 2007 Hilversum NH263 views
(5 votes)
SR-75AMoonrace.jpg
Sr-75a, Moonrace240 views
(5 votes)
Ishtar.jpg
Inanna - Ishtar274 viewsMufon LA nov. 2006- Lecture Jason Martell and the Search for Planet X or Nibiru according the research of Zecharia Sitchin: www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIGrX3xDT4g&mode=related&search= (9:00)
(5 votes)
A12avenger.2~0.jpg
A12 Avenger269 views
(5 votes)
george6.jpg
George Adamski UFOs491 viewsG.A.F. Int. Adamski Foundation: www.gafintl-adamski.com/

1891-1965)
First of the 1950s flying saucer contactees who claimed direct contact with beings who had traveled to Earth in space-ships from planets in outer space. Adamski was born in Poland on April 17, 1891. He was two years old when his family emigrated to Dunkirk, New York. In 1913 Adamski served with the 13th Cavalry on the Mexican border, received an honorable discharge from the army in 1919, then settled in Laguna Beach, California. He studied occult metaphysics and in 1936 founded the Royal Order of Tibet, through which he offered a course in self-mastery. Although he had no scientific training, he was often referred to as "Professor" by his Royal Order of Tibet mystical philosophy students. In 1940 he moved to the Valley Center with his followers, where they established a farming project. Four years later he moved to the southern slope of Mount Palomar in Southern California. He had no formal connection with the observatory there and worked as a handyman at a hamburger stand.

Soon after the modern flying saucer era began, Adamski emerged in 1947 as a popular lecturer. He claimed to have sighted a UFO in 1946 and in 1949 wrote a novel, Pioneers in Space, to promote discussion of the subject by the general public. He also began to show pictures of what he claimed were saucers he had seen near his home near Mount Palomar.

Adamski also coauthored, with Desmond Leslie,Flying Saucers Have Landed (1953), the book that launched the contactee phenomenon. Adamski claimed that he had been contacted by the Venusian occupant of a flying saucer that landed in the California desert November 20, 1952. Subsequently Adamski claimed to have had contact with spacemen from Mars and Saturn and to have traveled 50,000 miles into space in their craft. After Adamski's revelations, the convention of spaceman contacts, messages from outer space, and warnings about the welfare of the cosmos became firmly established. Adamski expanded upon his revelations in two subsequent volumes: Inside the Space Ships (1955) and Flying Saucers Farewell (1961).

By the late 1950s Adamski was an international celebrity who lectured to large audiences in North America and Europe. He also had his critics. In 1957 editor James Mosley devoted an issue of Saucer News to an expos? of Adamski. In 1963 Adamski's close associate C. A. Honey denounced him after discovering that Adamski had rewritten the original messages from the saucer beings in the Royal Order of Tibet materials. As his following had grown, Adamski had formed his followers into study groups and offered lessons in cosmic philosophy. In spite of the critics and defections, he retained a large following at the time of his death on April 23, 1965, from a heart attack, in Washington, D.C. His close associates founded the UFO Education Center in Valley Center, California, and the George Adamski Foundation, in Vista, California, to carry on his legacy.

Sources:

Adamski, George. Cosmic Philosophy. Freeman, S.D.: Pine Hill Press, 1961.

??. Flying Saucer Farewell. 1961. Reprint, Behind the Flying Saucer Mystery. New York: Paperback Library, 1967.

??. Inside the Space Ships. 1955. Reprint, Inside the Flying Saucers. New York: Paperback Library, 1967.

Barker, Gray. The Book of Adamski. Clarksburg, W. Va.: Saucerian Publications, 1965.

Leslie, Desmond, and George Adamski. Flying Saucers Have Landed. London: Werner Laurie, 1953. Rev. London: Neville Spearman, 1970.

Zinsstag & Timothy Good. George Adamski: The Untold Story. Beckenham, U.K.: Ceit Publications, 1983.



(5 votes)
haunebuI~0.jpg
Haunebu 1524 views
(5 votes)
milkhill.jpg
Milkhill , Wiltshire - 1991 ; Message near Alton Barnes: Talk to us..321 viewsOud Herbreeuwse Graancirkel inscriptie:
[Sewet Cham Anasim Gadasim],
EA-Enki (vlnr volgens Michael Green C.C.C.S.)
Oppono Astos,
Occului Nunc
OII OCCULUI II NUNC IIO : All things can be perfected! To Perfect the Imperfect is the essence of Alchemy.

(5 votes)
ufostore1.jpg
World's Largest Selection of UFO Videos, DVD's, and more! theUFOstore.com313 viewsSee: http://www.theUFOstore.com
(5 votes)
barcelona1999.jpg
1999- Barcelona, Spain213 views
(4 votes)
ontariojune1973.jpg
Ontario june 1973172 views
(4 votes)
VeriChipVeryWrong.jpg
Mind-Control Microchip Verichip Welcome to the Machines212 viewsPetitie: www.verichip.yourownrisk.nl/petitie.asp
See video: www.youtube.com/..VerichipWelcometotheMachines
Everything you need to know about coherent EM Mind-Control technologies - by Nick Begich: www.video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-2497840938718341112&q=nick+begich

Een Rapport van het Europees Parlement t.a.v. Klimaatontregeling en H.A.A.R.P. : www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//NL

27. is van mening dat HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) wegens de ingrijpende gevolgen daarvan voor het milieu een mondiale aangelegenheid is en dringt erop aan...

www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//NL

Rapport van het Europees Parlement:

30. roept in het bijzonder op tot het sluiten van een internationaal verdrag voor een wereldwijd verbod op onderzoek en ontwikkeling, zowel in de militaire als in de civiele sector, die erop gericht is om kennis omtrent de werking van de menselijke hersenen op basis van chemische of elektrische processen, geluidstrillingen of anderszins in te zetten voor de ontwikkeling van wapens die het mogelijk maken om mensen op enigerlei wijze te manipuleren, met inbegrip van een verbod op alle eventuele huidige of toekomstige toepassingen van dergelijke systemen.
I am absolutely opposed to a national ID card. This is a total contradiction of what a free society is all about. The purpose of government is to protect the secrecy and the privacy of all individuals, not the secrecy of government. We don't need a national ID card.
Ron Paul


(4 votes)
aurora6.jpg
Aurora SR-33A255 viewstinwiki.org/wiki/Aurora
(4 votes)
LO-USAJuly2002-2~0.jpg
LO - July 2nd, 2002209 views
(4 votes)
vril1.jpg
Vril 1302 views
(4 votes)
rfzhanebu11939.jpg
RFZ Haunebui 1939480 views
(4 votes)
ufo on the moon.JPG
UFO near the Moon217 viewsProof Ancient Indian High Tech Civilizations existed: www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread111071/pg1#
(4 votes)
imagesff.jpg
Founding Fathers and the Indians188 viewswww.republicoflakotah.com/
(3 votes)
megiddo%20fish.jpg
Two Fishes, zodiacal Sign of Pisces, Mosaic Found November 2005 at Mount Megiddo317 viewsSee: Postscript at page 307, The End of Days, Armageddon and Prophecies of the Return by Zecharia Sitchin.
www.sitchin.com

(3 votes)
Sverdlovskymarch1969ufocrashed.JPG
March 1969 - Sverdlovsky - UFO disc crashed192 views
(3 votes)
F-117NighthawkLockheedStealthFighter.jpg
F-117 Nighthawk Stealth Aviation - Lockheed, invisible to radar-detection 197 views
(3 votes)
highaltitudecloudfadedawayinafewminutes.jpg
high altitude cloud fades in a few minutes..[source; Goleta air and space museum]209 views
(3 votes)
auroraO3.jpg
O3 Aurora233 views
(3 votes)
nazi_ufo3a.jpg
Nazi-Ufo336 views
(3 votes)
AltarpieceOfTheAnnunciation1430-32.jpg
Altarpiece of the Annunciation 1430-1432 AD271 views
(3 votes)
book2-1.jpg
UFO DVDs, UFO Magazines, UFO Books and much more..253 viewswww.theUFOstore.com/
(2 votes)
16januari1958TrinidadeIslandBrasilNavy.jpg
16 Januari 1958 - Trinidad, Brasil Navy221 viewsPilot of helicopters wished to stress fact that object was of a saucer like nature, was stationary at 2000 ft. And would be glad to be called upon to verify any statements and act as witness.
?Emergency Report from Maxwell Air Force Base on air space violation by UFO, 1954.

It was silvery in color, had a bun-shaped top, a flange like two saucers in the middle and a bun underneath, and could not have been far off because it overlapped my windscreen!
?RAF fighter pilot, 1954.

Maximum security exists concerning the subject of UFOs.
?CIA Director Allen Dulles, 1955.

I have discussed this matter with the affected agencies of the government, and they are of the opinion that it is not wise to publicize this matter at this time.
?Senator Richard Russell, head of Senate Armed Services Committee, regarding his sighting of a UFO during a 1955 trip to the Soviet Union.

What bothers me is what's happening to our aircraft.
?Anonymous Air Force officer, 1955.

Reliable reports indicate there are objects coming into our atmosphere at very high speeds and controlled by thinking intelligences.
?Navy Admiral Delmar Fahrney, public statement, 1957.

The Air Defense Command in Baton Rouge was on the phone, waiting for our report, when we landed there.
?Commercial pilot following a UFO sighting, 1957.


(2 votes)
bellomonte.jpg
212 views
(2 votes)
kleitabletsumer.jpg
Sumerian Clay Tablet236 views
(2 votes)
heiroufo2.JPG
Hieroplanes found in Egypt south of Cairo some 3000 years old230 views
(2 votes)
texas012105Kaufman.jpg
01/21/05, Texas - Kaufman232 views
(2 votes)
feb1-2004Malta-Bahrija.jpg
1 februari 2004 - Malta, Bahjrija234 views
(2 votes)
antartica2003.jpg
Antarctica - 2003239 views
(2 votes)
ramanayoganananda.jpg
Ramana Maharshi and Paramahansa Yogananda208 viewsWebsite Ramana Maharshi Ashram: www.ramana-maharshi.org

Video Yogananda and how to dwell in Super Divine Bliss Consciousness, a Science that was brought by the Aryans, thus the Sumerian-Anunnakies from the North of Iran to India in 1500 BC, the land of the goddess Ishtar/Inanna (since 2900 BC goddess of cultus of the Indus Valley): www.youtube.com/watch?knowledgeoftheAncients

(2 votes)
Edwards_HomeF22.jpg
F22A Stealthbomber, Edwards Air Force Base201 views
(2 votes)
suntan1.jpg
Suntan198 views
(2 votes)
UFOTraingleimages.jpg
Image: Triangle, and STAR WARS Project 2012224 viewsASTRA TR3B EN ANGLETERRE, Somerset 7/4/1998, analysed by LUCASFILM Ltd, San Rafael CA -USA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIOxV1jaikk
(2 votes)
LockheedsX-22Adics.jpg
Lockheeds X-22A flying Discs..225 views
(2 votes)
ufos7.JPG
Ufo on Mars , Phobos II - 1989195 views
(2 votes)
UfosMarskpaper.JPG
187 views
(2 votes)
PyramidesMars.JPG
Pyramides op Mars177 views
(2 votes)
enki-I.jpg
Enki201 viewsEa's epithet-title after the division of duties and powers between him and his half brother and rival Enlil; father of Marduk by his spouse Damkina; failed to have a son by his half-sister Ninmah, but fathered five other sons by concubines and also children (Dusk-Aurora and Dawn) by Earthling females. See 'Lost Book of Enki'.
(2 votes)
lenticular3.jpg
199 views
(2 votes)
ufosummer.jpg
244 views
(2 votes)
NASAMarsian~0.jpg
Bob Lazar "Dennis" first interview in 1989 by George Knapp191 viewswww.youtube.com/watch?v=1i4Fu_L7cHM


(2 votes)
imagesCAZ4TUR9.jpg
187 views
(2 votes)
Cylinder on Moon.JPG
Cigar shaped Ufo on the Moon236 viewsClose Encounters and Proof that Aliens exist.
NASA officially admits about UFOs: "They are the remains of Martian life!"

Don't you believe it?
Watch yourself: www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6M9JR1COPw&mode=related=search= (50min13sec)

(2 votes)
zeist1.jpg
Chemtrails Zeist 2006248 viewsen - English






RAPPORT 155k 116k

14 janvier 1999 PE 227.710/d?f. A4-0005/99

sur l'environnement, la s?curit? et la politique ?trang?re
Rapporteur pour avis ( Proc?dure "Hughes"):
Mr Olsson, commission de l'environnement, de la sant? publique et de la protection des consommateurs
Commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense
Rapporteur: Mme Maj Britt Theorin


Au cours de la s?ance du 13 juillet 1995, le Pr?sident du Parlement a annonc? qu'il avait renvoy? la proposition de r?solution d?pos?e, conform?ment ? l'article 45 du r?glement, par Mme Rehn sur l'utilisation potentielle des ressources ? caract?re militaire pour les strat?gies environnementales, (B4-0551/95) ? la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense, pour examen au fond, et ? la commission de l'environnement, de la sant? publique et de la protection des consommateurs, pour avis.
A. PROPOSITION DE R?SOLUTION
B. EXPOS? DES MOTIFS
Annexe 1
AVIS


Au cours de la s?ance du 13 juillet 1995, le Pr?sident du Parlement a annonc? qu'il avait renvoy? la proposition de r?solution d?pos?e, conform?ment ? l'article 45 du r?glement, par Mme Rehn sur l'utilisation potentielle des ressources ? caract?re militaire pour les strat?gies environnementales, (B4-0551/95) ? la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense, pour examen au fond, et ? la commission de l'environnement, de la sant? publique et de la protection des consommateurs, pour avis.

Suite ? la demande de la Conf?rence des pr?sidents des commissions, le Pr?sident du Parlement a annonc? au cours de la s?ance du 15 novembre 1996 que la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense ?tait autoris?e ? pr?senter un rapport sur ce sujet.

Au cours de sa r?union du 19 novembre 1996,la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense a nomm? Mme Maj Britt Theorin rapporteur.

Au cours de la s?ance du 19 juin 1998, le Pr?sident du Parlement a annonc? que ce rapport devait ?tre ?labor?, conform?ment ? la proc?dure Hughes, par la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense et par la commission de l'environnement, de la sant? publique et de la protection des consommateurs.

Le projet de rapport a ?t? examin? par la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense lors de ses r?unions des 5 f?vrier 1998, 29 juin 1998, 21 juillet 1998, 3, 23 et 28 septembre 1998, 13, 27 et 29 octobre 1998 et 4/5 janvier 1999, ainsi que par la sous-commission de la s?curit? et du d?sarmement lors de ses r?unions des 5 f?vrier 1998, 3 et 23 septembre 1998.

Au cours de la derni?re de ses r?unions, la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense a adopt? la proposition de r?solution par 28 voix et 1 abstention.

?taient pr?sents au moment du vote les d?put?s Spencer, pr?sident; Theorin, rappporteur; Aelvoet, Andr?-L?onard, Bar?n-Crespo, Bertens, Bianco, Burenstam Linder, Carnero Gonz?lez, Carrozzo (suppl?ant M. Colajanni), Dillen, Dupuis, Gahrton, Goerens (suppl?ant M. Cars), Graziani, G?nther (suppl?ant M. Gomolka), Lalumi?re, Lambrias, Pack (suppl?ant M. Habsburg), Pettinari (suppl?ant M. Imbeni conform?ment ? l'article 138, paragraphe 2, du r?glement), Piha, Rinsche, Sakellariou, Salafranca S?nchez-Neyra, Schroedter (suppl?ant M. Cohn-Bendit), Schwaiger (suppl?ant Mme Lenz), Speciale, Swoboda (suppl?ant Mme Hoff), Tindemans, Titley et Truscott.

L'avis de la commission de l'environnement, de la sant? publique et de la protection des consommateurs est joint au pr?sent rapport.

Le rapport a ?t? d?pos? le 14 janvier 1999.

Le d?lai de d?p?t des amendements sera indiqu? dans le projet d'ordre du jour de la p?riode de session au cours de laquelle le rapport sera examin?.


A. PROPOSITION DE R?SOLUTION

R?solution sur l'environnement, la s?curit? et la politique ?trang?re: strat?gie en vue de l'utilisation de ressources militaires ? des fins environnementales

Le Parlement europ?en,

- vu la proposition de r?solution d?pos?e par Mme Rehn sur l'utilisation potentielle des ressources ? caract?re militaire pour les strat?gies environnementales (B4-0551/95),

- vu l'?tude des Nations unies "Charting potential uses of resources allocated to military activities for civilian endeavours to protect the environment", (UN A-46/364, 17 septembre 1991),

- vu sa r?solution du 17 juillet 1995 sur "les mines terrestres antipersonnel: un obstacle meurtrier au d?veloppement"(1),

- vu ses r?solutions pr?c?dentes sur la non-prolif?ration des armes nucl?aires et les essais nucl?aires et sur le rapport de la commission de Canberra d'ao?t 1996 concernant l'abolition des armes nucl?aires,

- vu la d?cision unanime de la Cour internationale de justice concernant l'obligation qui incombe aux ?tats nucl?aires de conclure un accord sur l'interdiction des armes nucl?aires (avis consultatif nΊ 96/22 du 8 juillet 1996),

- vu sa r?solution du 19 avril 1996 sur la proposition de d?cision du Conseil instituant un programme d'action communautaire en faveur de la protection civile(2),

- vu ses r?solutions pr?c?dentes sur les armes chimiques,

- vu les r?sultats des conf?rences des Nations unies de Kyoto en 1997 et de Rio de Janeiro en 1992,

- vu l'audition sur le projet HAARP et les armes non l?tales convoqu?e ? Bruxelles, le 5 f?vrier 1998, par la sous-commission "s?curit? et d?sarmement" de la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense,

- vu l'article 148 du r?glement,

- vu le rapport de la commission des affaires ?trang?res, de la s?curit? et de la politique de d?fense et l'avis de la commission de l'environnement, de la sant? publique et de la protection des consommateurs (A4-0005/99),

. constatant que la fin de la guerre froide a profond?ment modifi? la situation g?opolitique sur le plan de la s?curit? et que, dans le domaine militaire, la d?tente a conduit ? un d?sarmement g?n?ral et, en particulier, ? une limitation des armements nucl?aires, ce qui a permis de lib?rer d'?normes ressources militaires,

B. consid?rant qu'en d?pit de ce bouleversement total de la situation g?ostrat?gique depuis la fin de la guerre froide, le risque d'une atteinte d?sastreuse ? l'int?grit? et ? la durabilit? de l'environnement global n'a pas sensiblement diminu?, tant sur le plan des tirs d'armes nucl?aires accidentels ou non autoris?s que sur celui de l'utilisation licite d'armes nucl?aires dans la crainte infond?e d'une attaque imminente,

C. consid?rant qu'il serait possible de limiter consid?rablement ce risque en tr?s peu de temps si tous les ?tats poss?dant un arsenal nucl?aire mettaient en oeuvre rapidement les six mesures pr?vues par le rapport de la Commission de Canberra, en particulier s'ils retiraient toutes les armes nucl?aires du dispositif d'alerte rouge et transf?raient progressivement toutes les armes dans la r?serve strat?gique,

D. consid?rant que l'article VI du trait? de non-prolif?ration des armes nucl?aires (TNP) de 1968 invite toutes les parties signataires ? s'engager ? "continuer ? n?gocier de bonne foi ... un trait? sur un d?sarmement g?n?ral et complet" et notant que les principes et les objectifs adopt?s lors de la Conf?rence de 1995 sur la non-prolif?ration des armes nucl?aires r?affirmaient que l'objectif ultime du trait? ?tait l'abolition compl?te des armes nucl?aires,

E. notant que les menaces sur l'environnement, l'affluence de r?fugi?s, les conflits ethniques, le terrorisme et le crime international constituent de nouvelles menaces tr?s graves contre la s?curit? et que la facult? de g?rer diff?rentes formes de conflit prend de l'importance ? mesure que se modifie le contexte de la s?curit?, et consid?rant qu'il est important que les ressources affect?es au secteur militaire servent ?galement ? des fins non militaires puisque certaines menaces contre la s?curit? ne sont pas de nature militaire,

F. constatant que l'exploitation outranci?re des ressources de la plan?te est responsable de la fr?quence accrue ? laquelle surviennent les catastrophes naturelles et environnementales, notant que des probl?mes ?cologiques locaux et r?gionaux de cette nature peuvent avoir des incidences consid?rables sur les relations internationales et d?plorant que les ?tats membres n'en aient pas davantage tenu compte dans la mise en oeuvre de leur politique ?trang?re, de s?curit? et de d?fense,

G. consid?rant que, dans le monde, les conflits se d?roulent essentiellement ? un niveau intra?tatique plut?t qu'? un niveau inter?tatique et que, lorsqu'?clatent des conflits inter?tatiques, ces derniers concernent de plus en plus l'acc?s aux ressources vitales ou leur disponibilit?, en particulier l'eau, la nourriture et les combustibles,

H. consid?rant que l'acc?s ? ces ressources naturelles vitales et leur disponibilit? sont ?troitement li?s ? la d?t?rioration et ? la pollution de l'environnement, en ce qui concerne la cause aussi bien que l'effet, et que la pr?vention des conflits doit donc de plus en plus ?tre ax?e sur ces questions,

I. consid?rant que les pressions qui s'exercent sur les terres - ? des fins d'exploitation aussi bien que d'habitation - et qui ont toujours constitu? une des principales causes de tensions et de conflits, sont de plus en plus souvent imputables ? la d?gradation de l'environnement, en particulier les changements climatiques et l'?l?vation du niveau des mers qui en r?sulte,

J. consid?rant que l'ensemble de ces facteurs, qui affectent avant tout les populations les plus pauvres et les plus vuln?rables de la terre, favorisent de plus en plus l'apparition de r?fugi?s dits "environnementaux", ce qui fait na?tre une pression directe sur les politiques de l'immigration et de la justice de l'Union europ?enne (UE), sur l'aide au d?veloppement et sur les ressources affect?es ? l'aide humanitaire, tout en accroissent indirectement les probl?mes de s?curit? de l'UE du fait de l'existence de foyers d'instabilit? r?gionale dans d'autres parties du monde,

K. consid?rant que, selon les r?sultats d'une recherche internationale d?taill?e men?e ? bien et publi?e par le Climate Institute de Washington, le nombre de "r?fugi?s environnementaux" d?passe maintenant celui des "r?fugi?s traditionnels" (25 millions contre 22 millions) et devrait doubler d'ici 2010, voire davantage dans la pire des hypoth?ses,

L. consid?rant que la question des "r?fugi?s environnementaux" n'est que le sympt?me d'un d?sastre humanitaire d'une ampleur beaucoup plus grande, sachant que 1,3 milliard de personnes vivent dans la pauvret? absolue selon la d?finition des Nations unies; que plus d'un quart de ces personnes tentent de subsister dans des r?gions du monde extr?mement vuln?rables sur le plan environnemental o? elles constituent le facteur essentiel de probl?mes environnementaux plan?taires comme la d?forestation et la d?sertification,

M. consid?rant que, depuis la fin de la guerre froide, bien que le contexte id?ologique qui pr?dominait auparavant ait largement disparu de la gestion des questions globales et que cette derni?re d?pende beaucoup moins de la question de l'?quilibre militaire, il n'en reste pas moins que cette situation devrait encore se refl?ter dans le syst?me de gestion globale des Nations unies en mettant l'accent sur la coh?rence et l'efficacit? des ?l?ments ? la fois militaires et non militaires de la politique de s?curit?,

N. consid?rant n?anmoins qu'une part croissante des travaux des Nations unies dans le domaine des questions de politique et de s?curit? globale est essentiellement d'ordre non militaire et porte avant tout sur les relations entre le commerce, l'aide, l'environnement et un d?veloppement durable,

O. constatant qu'il y a lieu de mobiliser d'urgence des ressources appropri?es afin de relever les d?fis environnementaux et notant que les ressources disponibles en mati?re de protection de l'environnement sont tr?s limit?es, ce qui implique une nouvelle conception de l'utilisation des ressources d?j? existantes,

P. notant que les forces arm?es ont une opportunit? unique et une capacit? ?norme de soutenir les efforts du secteur civil en vue de ma?triser les probl?mes environnementaux accrus ? mesure que les ressources militaires sont lib?r?es,

Q. constatant que les ressources militaires rel?vent du domaine national, alors que les d?fis environnementaux ont un caract?re global et que, d?s lors, il y a lieu de poser les jalons d'une coop?ration internationale en mati?re de transfert et d'utilisation des ressources militaires ? la fin de prot?ger l'environnement,

R. consid?rant que les co?ts ? court terme de la protection de l'environnement doivent ?tre ?valu?s par rapport aux co?ts ? long terme de l'inertie dans ce domaine et constatant que s'affirme la n?cessit? de proc?der ? une analyse du rapport co?t-efficacit? de diff?rentes strat?gies environnementales englobant les transferts ?ventuels, le r?am?nagement et le red?ploiement des ressources li?es au secteur militaire,

S. constatant qu'il ne sera pas possible de r?aliser l'objectif commun de l'assainissement des ?cosyst?mes endommag?s de la plan?te sans veiller ? l'exploitation ?quitable des ressources mondiales; qu'il est n?cessaire de faciliter la coop?ration technique internationale et de promouvoir le transfert de technologies militaires appropri?es,

T. consid?rant que la recherche militaire porte actuellement sur la manipulation de l'environnement ? des fins militaires, et ce en d?pit des conventions existantes; c'est le cas, par exemple, du syst?me HAARP bas? en Alaska,

U. consid?rant que l'exp?rience acquise dans le domaine du d?veloppement et de l'utilisation de l'?nergie nucl?aire ? des fins pacifiques constitue une mise en garde salutaire contre l'invocation du secret militaire pour emp?cher une ?valuation correcte et un contr?le des technologies relevant ? la fois des domaines civil et militaire puisque la transparence est de toute fa?on compromise,

V. consid?rant que la crainte g?n?rale d'un d?clin ?cologique et d'une crise environnementale doit inciter les ?tats ? fixer des priorit?s dans leur processus de d?cision et encourager les nations ? r?agir conjointement et efficacement ? l'?gard des catastrophes environnementales,

1. invite la Commission ? pr?senter au Conseil et au Parlement une strat?gie commune telle que pr?vue dans le trait? d'Amsterdam qui, d'ici 2000 ? 2010, ?tablisse les liens entre les aspects de la politique de l'UE li?s ? la politique ?trang?re et de s?curit? commune (PESC) et ses politiques dans les domaines du commerce, de l'aide, du d?veloppement et de l'environnement au plan international, de mani?re ? aborder les questions suivantes et ? examiner leur interaction:

a) la production agricole et alimentaire et la d?t?rioration de l'environnement,

b) la p?nurie d'eau et l'approvisionnement transfrontalier en eau,

c) la d?forestation et le r?tablissement des mines de charbon,

d) le ch?mage, le sous-emploi et la pauvret? absolue,

e) le d?veloppement durable et les changements climatiques,

f) la d?forestation, la d?sertification et la croissance de la population,

g) l'interaction entre l'ensemble des facteurs susmentionn?s et le r?chauffement de la plan?te, de m?me que l'impact de l'augmentation des ?v?nements climatiques extr?mes sur l'homme et l'environnement;

2. constate que les actions environnementales pr?ventives repr?sentent un instrument important sur le plan de la politique de s?curit?; invite, par cons?quent, les ?tats membres ? introduire des objectifs environnementaux et sanitaires dans leurs ?valuations, leur recherche militaire et leurs plans d'action ? long terme dans les domaines de la d?fense et de la s?curit?;

3. reconna?t le r?le important que joue l'arm?e dans la soci?t? d?mocratique et ses t?ches pour la d?fense du territoire, de m?me que le fait que des initiatives visant ? garantir et ? r?tablir la paix peuvent dans une large mesure contribuer ? ?viter les pr?judices environnementaux;

4. constate que les essais nucl?aires atmosph?riques et souterrains comportent des retomb?es radioactives qui ont entra?n? la dispersion d'?normes quantit?s de c?sium 137 radioactif, de strontium 90 et d'autres isotopes canc?rig?nes sur l'ensemble de la plan?te, et qu'ils ont ?t? terriblement pr?judiciables ? l'environnement et ? la sant? dans les zones d'essai;

5. consid?re que plusieurs r?gions du monde sont menac?es par le stockage et l'immersion incontr?l?s, dangereux et inappropri?s de sous-marins nucl?aires et de b?timents de surface, avec leur combustible nucl?aire et leurs r?acteurs nucl?aires fissur?s, vu qu'il est hautement probable que de vastes r?gions pourraient ?tre rapidement contamin?es par les radiations qui s'en d?gagent;

6. note qu'il s'agit encore et toujours de r?soudre le probl?me des armes chimiques et conventionnelles immerg?es ? de multiples endroits dans les mers europ?ennes apr?s les deux guerres mondiales, l'immersion ?tant une solution de facilit? pour se d?barrasser de ces stocks; constate que personne ne sait ? ce jour quelle peut en ?tre l'incidence sur l'environnement ? long terme, notamment sur les poissons et la vie baln?aire;

7. consid?re que l'UE devra apporter sa contribution au r?glement du probl?me; constate que la guerre qui continue de ravager des r?gions enti?res d'Afrique a d?truit les structures sociales et agricoles et qu'un d?sastre environnemental frappe ? pr?sent les terres du fait de la d?sertification r?sultant de la d?forestation et de l'?rosion;

8. demande ? l'arm?e de mettre un terme aux activit?s qui contribuent ? la d?t?rioration de l'environnement et de la sant?, et de prendre toute mesure qui s'impose afin de nettoyer et d'assainir les zones pollu?es;

S'agissant de l'affectation de ressources militaires ? des fins environnementales,

9. consid?re que les ressources disponibles pour assainir et sauver l'environnement ravag? sont insuffisantes pour relever les d?fis ?cologiques globaux; demande en cons?quence que les ?tats membres s'engagnt ? affecter des ressources militaires ? la protection de l'environnement par le biais de:

a) l'introduction d'une formation de soldats de l'environnement dans le but de cr?er une brigade europ?enne commune de protection de l'environnement,

b) l'?valuation de leurs besoins environnementaux et des ressources militaires pouvant ?tre affect?es ? l'environnement, et l'utilisation de ces ressources dans leurs programmes nationaux de protection de l'environnement,

c) l'?valuation des ressources militaires pouvant ?tre mises ? la disposition des Nations unies ou de l'UE ? titre provisoire, ? long terme ou en cas de besoin, en tant qu'instrument de coop?ration internationale dans le cas de d?sastres ou de crises ?cologiques,

d) le d?veloppement de programmes en vue de la cr?ation d'unit?s de protection internationales et europ?ennes utilisant du personnel, des ?quipements et des installations militaires mises ? leur disposition au titre du partenariat pour la paix en cas de situation de crise environnementale,

e) l'introduction des objectifs du d?veloppement durable respectueux de l'environnement dans leur concept de s?curit?,

f) la garantie que les forces arm?es respectent les r?gles environnementales ?tablies et que les d?g?ts ant?rieurs caus?s par celles-ci ? l'environnement seront r?par?s,

g) l'introduction de consid?rations environnementales dans leurs programmes militaires de recherche et de d?veloppement;

10. au regard de l'exp?rience concr?te lacunaire dans ce domaine, prie instamment les gouvernements des ?tats membres:

a) de cr?er des centres pour l'?change d'informations concernant l'exp?rience acquise sur le plan national dans le domaine de l'affectation de ressources militaires ? la protection de l'environnement,

b) de faciliter la diffusion globale de donn?es environnementales, en ce compris celles fournies par leurs satellites militaires ou obtenues par le biais d'autres plates-formes de collecte d'informations,

11. invite les ?tats membres ? appliquer la l?gislation environnementale en vigueur pour la soci?t? civile ? l'ensemble de l'activit? militaire et ? faire en sorte que le secteur militaire se charge et assume le co?t de l'examen et de l'assainissement des zones endommag?es du fait d'activit?s militaires ant?rieures de mani?re ? pouvoir les r?affecter ? des fins civiles; une telle d?marche rev?t une importance particuli?re pour les vastes entrep?ts de munitions chimiques et conventionnelles le long des c?tes de l'UE;

12. invite l'ensemble des ?tats membres ? fixer des objectifs environnementaux et sanitaires ainsi que des plans d'action visant ? am?liorer la protection de l'environnement et de la sant? au sein de leurs forces arm?es respectives;

13. prie instamment les gouvernements des ?tats membres d'am?liorer progressivement la protection de l'environnement dans le secteur militaire par le biais de la formation, du d?veloppement technique et d'une initiation fondamentale de l'ensemble du personnel des forces arm?es et de tous les appel?s ? la connaissance de l'environnement;

14. demande ? l'UE d'unir ses efforts autour d'une nouvelle strat?gie de l'environnement visant ? affecter les ressources militaires ? la protection commune de l'environnement;

15. consid?re que les strat?gies environnementales devraient comporter le contr?le de l'environnement de la terre, l'?valuation des donn?es collect?es, la coordination des activit?s scientifiques, la diffusion de l'information et l'exploitation des donn?es pertinentes fournies par les syst?mes d'observation et de contr?le nationaux afin d'?tablir un bilan continu et exhaustif de l'?tat de l'environnement;

16. souligne que l'importante r?duction des d?penses militaires peut conduire ? d'importantes crises au plan r?gional et invite de ce fait les ?tats membres ? accro?tre leurs efforts de conversion de la production et de la technologie militaires en faveur de produits et d'applications civiles gr?ce ? des programmes nationaux et ? des initiatives communautaires comme le programme KONVER;

17. souligne l'importance d'un renforcement des activit?s environnementales pr?ventives afin de pouvoir lutter contre les catastrophes environnementales et naturelles;

18. prie instamment la Commission d'examiner en profondeur les menaces sur l'environnement r?sultant de la politique de s?curit? en Europe et de r?diger un "livre vert" sur les activit?s militaires ? incidences environnementales;

19. invite le Conseil ? accro?tre ses efforts pour que les ?tats-Unis, la Russie, l'Inde et la Chine signent l'accord conclu ? Ottawa en 1997 sur l'interdiction des mines anti-personnel;

20. consid?re que l'UE devrait renforcer ses mesures de soutien aux victimes de mines terrestres et encourager le d?veloppement de techniques de d?minage; est d'avis que le d?veloppement desdites techniques doit ?tre acc?l?r?;

21. consid?re qu'il y a lieu de d?noncer la politique du secret en mati?re de recherche militaire et qu'il faut privil?gier le droit ? l'information et au contr?le d?mocratique des projets de recherche militaire;

22. prie instamment les ?tats membres de d?velopper des technologies de destruction d'armes compatibles avec l'environnement;

23. souligne qu'une des menaces environnementales les plus graves qui existent ? proximit? de l'UE est le manque de contr?le des d?chets de l'industrie nucl?aire et des stocks d'armes biologiques et chimiques, de m?me que l'absence de mesures d'assainissement ? l'issue d'activit?s militaires; souligne qu'il importe que les ?tats membres oeuvrent en faveur d'un renforcement de la coop?ration internationale, par exemple dans le cadre des Nations unies ou du Partenariat pour la paix, de mani?re ? ce que ces armes soient d?truites d'une mani?re aussi compatible que possible avec la protection de l'environnement;

24. est d'avis que toutes les n?gociations futures sur la limitation et l'abolition ?ventuelle des armements nucl?aires devront tendre ? la r?duction mutuelle et ?quilibr?e des stocks d'armes;

25. estime, compte tenu de la situation particuli?rement difficile des pays de l'ancienne Union sovi?tique, que la menace que la d?t?rioration de l'?tat des armes et des mat?riaux nucl?aires encore d?tenus par ces pays repr?sente pour l'environnement aux niveaux tant global que local rend encore plus urgente la conclusion d'un accord sur la poursuite de l'?limination progressive des armes nucl?aires;

S'agissant des aspects l?gaux des activit?s militaires

26. demande ? l'Union europ?enne de faire en sorte que les nouvelles techniques d'armes dites nonl?tales et le d?veloppement de nouvelles strat?gies d'armements soient ?galement couverts et r?gis par des conventions internationales;

27. consid?re que le projet HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project), en raison de son impact g?n?ral sur l'environnement, pose des probl?mes globaux et demande que ses implications juridiques, ?cologiques et ?thiques soient examin?es par un organe international ind?pendant avant la poursuite des travaux de recherche et la r?alisation d'essais; d?plore que le gouvernement des ?tats-Unis ait ? maintes reprises refus? d'envoyer un repr?sentant pour apporter un t?moignage sur les risques que comporte pour l'environnement et la population le projet HAARP financ? actuellement en Alaska, durant l'audition publique ou ? l'occasion d'une r?union subs?quente de sa commission comp?tente;

28. demande ? l'organe charg? de l'?valuation des choix scientifiques et technologiques (STOA) d'accepter d'examiner les preuves scientifiques et techniques fournies par tous les r?sultats existants de la recherche sur le programme HAARP aux fins d'?valuer la nature et l'ampleur exactes du danger que HAARP repr?sente pour l'environnement local et global et pour la sant? publique en g?n?ral;

29. invite la Commission ? examiner les incidences sur l'environnement et la sant? publique du programme HAARP pour l'Antarctique, en coop?ration avec les gouvernements de Su?de, de Finlande, de Norv?ge et de la F?d?ration de Russie, et ? faire rapport au Parlement sur le r?sultat de ses investigations;

30. demande en particulier que soit ?tabli un accord international visant ? interdire au niveau global tout projet de recherche et de d?veloppement, tant militaire que civil, qui cherche ? appliquer la connaissance des processus du fonctionnement du cerveau humain dans les domaines chimique, ?lectrique, des ondes sonores ou autres au d?veloppement d'armes, ce qui pourrait ouvrir la porte ? toute forme de manipulation de l'homme; un tel accord devrait ?galement interdire toute possibilit? d'utilisation r?elle ou potentielle de tels syst?mes;

31. demande ? l'UE et ? ses ?tats membres d'oeuvrer ? la conclusion de trait?s internationaux visant ? prot?ger l'environnement contre des destructions inutiles en cas de conflit;

32. demande ? l'UE et ? ses ?tats membres de veiller ? ce que les incidences environnementales des activit?s des forces arm?es en temps de paix soient ?galement soumises ? des normes internationales;

33. demande au Conseil des ministres de l'UE de prendre une part active ? la mise en oeuvre des propositions de la Commission de Canberra et de l'article VI du TNP;

34. invite le Conseil et les gouvernements britannique et fran?ais en particulier, ? prendre la t?te dans le contexte du TNP et de la conf?rence sur le d?sarmement en ce qui concerne la poursuite de n?gociations relatives ? la pleine application des engagements pris quant ? la r?duction des armes nucl?aires et ? un d?sarmement aussi rapide que possible, de fa?on ? atteindre un niveau o?, provisoirement, le stock global des armes encore existantes ne constitue plus une menace pour l'int?grit? et la durabilit? de l'environnement global;

35. invite la pr?sidence du Conseil, la Commission et les gouvernements des ?tats membres ? d?fendre la position adopt?e dans la pr?sente r?solution dans le contexte de toutes les prochaines r?unions des Nations unies plac?es sous les auspices du TNP ou en rapport avec celui-ci, et de la Conf?rence sur le d?sarmement;

36. invite la pr?sidence du Conseil et de la Commission, conform?ment ? l'article J.7 du trait? sur l'Union europ?enne, ? lui faire rapport sur la position de l'Union concernant les points sp?cifiques contenus dans la pr?sente r?solution, notamment dans le contexte des prochaines r?unions des Nations unies, de ses agences et de ses organes, en particulier celles de la commission pr?paratoire du TNP de 1999, de la conf?rence sur le d?sarmement et tous les autres forums internationaux comp?tents;

37. charge son Pr?sident de transmettre la pr?sente r?solution au Conseil, ? la Commission, aux ?tats membres de l'Union europ?enne et aux Nations unies.

(1) () JO C 183 du 17.7.1995, p. 47 ( A4-0149/95).
(2) () JO C 141 du 13.5.1996, p. 258 (A4-0100/96).




B. EXPOS? DES MOTIFS

Des forces arm?es luttant contre les menaces sur l'environnement

En mati?re de politique de s?curit?, la situation a consid?rablement ?volu? depuis quelque temps. Il y a un peu moins de dix ann?es, un rideau de fer se dressait au centre d'une Europe dot?e d'armements nucl?aires. ? pr?sent l'Europe s'unifie. L'Union europ?enne envisage un ?largissement vers d'anciens pays du Pacte de Varsovie. L'?re de la guerre froide est r?volue et il semble aujourd'hui impossible qu'un conflit majeur puisse ?clater en Europe. Parall?lement ? cette ?volution, l'?norme affluence de r?fugi?s, les conflits ethniques, le terrorisme et le crime international constituent autant de nouveaux dangers venant menacer la s?curit? quotidienne. Les catastrophes naturelles et les probl?mes environnementaux, qu'ils aient une cause naturelle, ou qu'ils d?coulent de l'exploitation des ressources de la terre par l'homme font peser une autre menace tout aussi grave.

Une s?rie de catastrophes naturelles a plac? l'humanit? devant de nouveaux probl?mes. La derni?re en date est la rupture d'une digue en Espagne. L'?rosion des terres en Italie, les ravages caus?s par le ph?nom?ne naturel El Ni?o et l'accident nucl?aire de Tchernobyl sont autant de ph?nom?nes et d'accidents ayant provoqu? des catastrophes naturelles et environnementales. Dans certaines parties du monde, la s?cheresse peut interdire toute possibilit? de moisson durant des ann?es, de sorte qu'une grande partie de la population souffre de la famine qui, souvent, conduit ? la mort. Face ? ces catastrophes, l'homme ne peut que constater son impuissance.

Les catastrophes environnementales et naturelles constituent une trag?die pour chaque individu et peuvent avoir des cons?quences d?sastreuses pour la soci?t? et la nation tout enti?re. Leur co?t est ?norme, aussi bien en termes de pertes en vies humaines qu'en termes de d?penses li?es ? la r?paration des d?g?ts mat?riels. Lorsqu'elles surviennent, force est de constater que la d?tection et/ou la pr?vention n'avaient pas ?t? dot?es de ressources suffisantes. De surcro?t, les mesures entreprises sont, souvent, trop tardives. Il faut renforcer les mesures de pr?vention, ce qui n?cessite des investissements ?normes. Mais les ressources sont tr?s limit?es. En cons?quence, il faut repenser l'utilisation des ressources disponibles tout en favorisant l'?mergence de nouvelles ressources. Il est ?vident qu'une nation ne peut mener une lutte isol?e contre les catastrophes naturelles car les probl?mes environnementaux impliquent une coop?ration internationale. Les menaces sont de nature globale et la coop?ration internationale est indispensable.

Les probl?mes ?cologiques locaux et r?gionaux peuvent avoir des incidences ?normes sur les relations internationales. Les retomb?es radioactives, les inondations et la s?cheresse ne respectent pas les fronti?res internationales. Les r?fugi?s fuyant les catastrophes environnementales traversent des fronti?res pour se rendre dans des pays aussi pauvres, voire plus pauvres que le leur. Ces nouvelles causes d'instabilit? et d'ins?curit? doivent ?tre reproduites dans le contenu et la nature des m?thodes utilis?es par les Nations pour le maintien et l'?tablissement de la paix et de la s?curit?. Puisque les probl?mes environnementaux et ?cologiques menacent s?rieusement la paix et la s?curit?, ils devront ?galement sous-tendre la politique ?trang?re, de d?fense et de s?curit?. Il faut analyser comment utiliser les ressources militaires pour s'attaquer ? cette menace accrue sur la s?curit? et annihiler ces nouvelles sources d'instabilit? et d'inqui?tude. Ces ressources doivent ?tre mobilis?es d'urgence afin de relever les d?fis environnementaux.

En mati?re de politique de s?curit?, la nouvelle donne a men? ? la d?tente militaire, au d?sarmement et ? des mesures visant ? instaurer la confiance entre les anciens ennemis que sont les ?tats-Unis et la Russie, ce qui a conduit ? une amputation consid?rable du budget de la d?fense, ? une r?duction des effectifs et ? la mise au rebus de mat?riel militaire.

La d?fense a surtout fait l'objet de mesures de restriction en Russie et aux ?tats-Unis, l'Europe a embo?t? le pas en r?duisant ses d?penses militaires(1).

? mesure que les ressources militaires sont d?gag?es, les forces arm?es disposent d'une opportunit? unique de s'attaquer aux probl?mes environnementaux croissants puisque leur potentiel est ?norme. L'arm?e est une organisation bien entra?n?e dot?e de moyens techniques complets pouvant ?tre utilis?s pour atteindre des objectifs environnementaux sans que cela entra?ne des co?ts ?lev?s. Il suffit de r?affecter ou de red?ployer des ressources. L'union europ?enne peut regrouper ses efforts autour d'une nouvelle strat?gie environnementale visant ? affecter les ressources militaires ? un objectif commun de protection de l'environnement. L'Union europ?enne peut initier la prise de conscience ?cologique commune et globale, et, par la m?me occasion, favoriser les efforts de paix et d'instauration de la confiance.

Les ?tats membres disposent ? la fois des atouts techniques et ?conomiques pour adopter une attitude totalement responsable ? l'?gard de l'environnement. Ils savent aussi quelles seraient les cons?quences d'un refus de relever les d?fis environnementaux. La d?gradation ?cologique influence les conditions de la croissance et du d?veloppement ?conomique, mais il n'emp?che que les d?penses militaires de par le monde sont trois ? cinq fois plus importantes que les sommes consacr?es ? la protection de l'environnement(2).

Le secteur de la d?fense en soi d?grade ?norm?ment l'environnement, ce qui devrait inciter les militaires ? adopter une attitude nettement plus responsable en la mati?re.

Menaces modernes sur la s?curit?

Le monde international prend de plus en plus conscience de l'ampleur des probl?mes environnementaux. En t?moignent les conf?rences de suivi des Nations unies sur l'eau (Mar del Plata), la d?sertification (Nairobi), l'environnement et le d?veloppement (Rio de Janeiro) et le changement climatique (Kyoto). Les probl?mes environnementaux peuvent g?n?rer des probl?mes tellement graves qu'ils sont susceptibles de menacer aussi bien la s?curit? des hommes que celle des ?tats. Ils peuvent aussi avoir une incidence sur les relations internationales des ?tats. L'air et l'eau ne connaissent pas de fronti?res internationales. Voici des exemples concrets de menaces potentielles ou existantes sur l'environnement:

Ressources hydrauliques limit?es

La demande d'eau propre augmente au diapason de la croissance de la population mondiale. La r?partition de l'eau douce naturelle est tr?s d?s?quilibr?e. Moins de 10 pays poss?dent 60 % de la totalit? des ressources d'eau douce de la plan?te(3). D'ailleurs, plusieurs pays d'Europe doivent importer de l'eau. Dor?navant, les attaques contre les sources d'eau potable ne constitueront plus un objectif en soi, mais bien un motif de conflit. Les conflits en mati?re de droit d'acc?s ? l'eau peuvent renforcer la tension internationale et locale et/ou d?boucher sur des conflits mondiaux. Par exemple, dans le cas de l'Inde et du Pakistan dont les relations sont tendues, des litiges ayant trait au fleuve Indus pourraient entra?ner un conflit arm?. Si l'on ?tablissait une liste des conflits potentiels li?s ? la ma?trise de l'eau douce, celle-ci serait longue. Quelque 300 fleuves, lacs et sources souterraines sont situ?s dans des zones frontali?res(4). Au Moyen-Orient, neuf pays sur 14 souffrent d'une p?nurie d'eau, mais il y a de fortes chances que les autres pays soient eux aussi un jour expos?s ? ce risque(5). En 1995, 1/5e de la population mondiale n'avait pas acc?s ? l'eau potable. Selon les estimations, la proportion sera de 2/3 en 2025(6).

Changement climatique

L'accroissement des ?missions, notamment des ?missions de dioxyde de carbone(7) a entra?n? une augmentation de la temp?rature moyenne de la plan?te de l'ordre de 5Ί durant le si?cle pr?sent. La chaleur a ?galement ?t? plus intense. Des chercheurs ont d?couvert que l'humidit? de l'air avait augment? de 10 % au cours des vingt derni?res ann?es. Dans certaines r?gions, cette humidit? accrue peut d?clencher des temp?tes plus violentes et plus fr?quentes, tandis que d'autres r?gions souffrent de la s?cheresse. Vingt ann?es de recherche intensive sur le changement climatique global seront peut-?tre n?cessaires avant de prendre une d?cision quant aux mesures qui s'imposent.

Selon les pr?visions du groupe intergouvernemental pour l'?tude du changement climatique (IPCC), une organisation internationale regroupant 2000 des meilleurs chercheurs mondiaux, la temp?rature de la plan?te augmentera de 1,5 ? 4,5 Ί et le niveau de la mer montera de 50 cm d'ici ? 2100 si les ?missions de dioxyde de carbone se maintiennent au niveau actuel. Les statistiques r?v?lent qu'un tiers de la population mondiale et un tiers des infrastructures sont regroup?s dans les r?gions c?ti?res. Une mont?e du niveau de la mer entra?nerait l'inondation de gigantesques r?gions. Des millions de personnes pourraient alors souffrir de la famine suite ? la perte de vastes zones agricoles.

Ce risque ainsi que d'autres peuvent entra?ner des exodes. Les r?fugi?s fuyant les catastrophes environnementales deviennent une pr?occupation majeure pour les ?tats du monde. Quelque 25 millions d'?tres humains ont ?t? chass?s par la s?cheresse, l'?rosion des terres, la d?sertification et d'autres probl?mes environnementaux, tandis que les r?fugi?s "traditionnels" repr?sentent environ 22 millions de personnes. Selon certains experts, les r?fugi?s de l'environnement peuvent provoquer "une des plus graves crises de notre ?poque"(8). Ils sont confront?s ? des probl?mes socio-politiques et ?conomiques pouvant d?clencher des conflits et des explosions de violence. Il faut leur accorder un statut officiel. Il faut s'attaquer au prob?me par le biais d'une coop?ration internationale renforc?e et augmenter l'aide aux pays menac?s et ? leurs habitants.

Impact environnemental des forces arm?es en temps de guerre et en temps de paix

Les forces arm?es sont un important facteur de d?gradation ?cologique. Leurs activit?s ont des incidences n?gatives ?normes sur l'environnement, aussi bien en temps de paix qu'en temps de guerre (certaines sont intentionnelles, d'autres involontaires). Depuis l'antiquit?, la destruction de l'environnement est une m?thode de guerre classique. D'ailleurs c'est la guerre qui nuit le plus ? l'environnement. En t?moignent les cons?quences terribles de la guerre du golfe o? des centaines de puits de p?trole ont ?t? la proie des flammes et o? des quantit?s de substances toxiques ont ?t? rejet?es dans l'atmosph?re de mani?re incontr?l?e. Il faudra du temps ? l'environnement pour s'en remettre. Certaines d?gradations peuvent ?tre irr?m?diables.

Les militaires d?veloppent des armes toujours plus puissantes provoquant des destructions sur une grande ?chelle. Sur le plan de l'environnement, une guerre moderne est plus destructrice que toute autre activit? polluante. Certains syst?mes d'armement, d?crits ci-dessous, sont ?galement susceptibles de d?grader gravement l'environnement en temps de paix.

Mines

Les mines d?truisent ?norm?ment l'environnement. Selon le PNUE (Programme des Nations unies pour l'environnement), les mines terrestres constituent l'arme la plus r?pandue que les guerres laissent derri?re elles; elles peuvent influencer l'?quilibre ?cologique. Le minage d?truit de vastes zones, souvent dans des r?gions agricoles qui deviennent inutilisables pendant longtemps. Les mines constituent l'obstacle majeur au d?veloppement dans de nombreux pays parmi les plus pauvres de la plan?te. 80 ? 110 millions de mines ont ?t? pos?es dans 65 pays. Elles peuvent exploser plusieurs dizaines d'ann?es plus tard, faisant surtout des victimes parmi la population civile, en particulier les enfants. La neutralisation des mines est un processus extr?mement dangereux, lent et co?teux. Le d?veloppement de nouvelles m?thodes de d?minage progresse trop lentement. Il faut acc?l?rer le processus.

Il faut se f?liciter que la conf?rence d'Oslo ait abouti en 1997 ? l'interdiction, sans exception, de toutes les mines antipersonnel, ? l'obligation de d?truire tous les stocks(9) de mines dans un d?lai de quatre ann?es et au renforcement de l'aide aux pays concern?s par ce fl?au. La Convention a ?t? sign?e ? Ottawa en 1997 par un grand nombre d'?tats, ? l'exception toutefois des ?tats-Unis, de la Russie, de l'Inde, de la Chine et d'autres ?tats qui ont pr?f?r? s'abstenir. L'Union europ?enne doit oeuvrer ? l'adh?sion imm?diate de ces pays ? l'accord. L'UE doit renforcer son aide aux victimes des mines et soutenir le d?veloppement de techniques de d?minage.

Armes non-l?tales(10)

Les armes dites non-l?tales ne sont pas un nouveau type d'armes. Elles existent depuis de nombreuses ann?es sous la forme, par exemple, de canons ? eau, de balles en caoutchouc et de gaz lacrymog?ne. Toutefois, les techniques deviennent de plus en plus sophistiqu?es. Elles sont appel?es non-l?tales bien qu'elles puissent faire beaucoup de d?g?ts, voire entra?ner l'invalidit? ou la mort.

Les armes technologiques mises au point peuvent ?tre dirig?es contres des objectifs mat?riels et humains. Citons, ? titre d'exemple, les armes acoustiques ? infrasons, des sons de basse fr?quence permettant de semer la confusion dans les rangs de l'ennemi, de le d?sorienter et, partant, de le neutraliser. La mousse paralysante et les lasers aveuglants sont d'autres exemples au m?me titre que certains produits chimiques qui, colorant l'eau, peuvent avoir un effet n?faste sur l'agriculture et mettre la population en danger. Les rayonnements ?lectromagn?tiques peuvent ?tre utilis?s pour neutraliser les syst?mes de donn?es, de navigation et de communication. Les armes dites non-l?tales peuvent aussi ?tre utilis?es contre les infrastructures et les administrations publiques, neutraliser le r?seau ferroviaire et jeter dans le chaos le syst?me financier d'un pays. Ces armes(11) pr?sentent des aspects communs: elles sont con?ues pour retarder, bloquer et vaincre un adversaire potentiel "sur le plan strat?gique".

Classer toutes ces armes sous la d?nomination commune et fallacieuse d'armes non-l?tales cr?e un grave malentendu. La d?nomination "non-l?tale" signifie que ces armes sont plus humaines que les armes conventionnelles. Or, il n'existe pas d'armes humaines. Tout type d'arme est susceptible de causer des d?g?ts ou de tuer, ce qui est pr?cis?ment sa raison d'?tre. En r?gle g?n?rale, les armes nonl?tales seront utilis?es durant la phase initiale d'un conflit; elles peuvent d'ailleurs constituer l'?l?ment d?clencheur du conflit. Les soldats et les policiers sont peut-?tre devenus plus violents parce que ces armes sont r?put?es moins dangereuses. Le danger majeur est que celles-ci risquent d'abaisser le seuil d'utilisation de la violence pour le r?glement des conflits.

L'objectif est de neutraliser l'ennemi sans lui infliger de longues souffrances et sans causer la mort. Le probl?me est de savoir comment et contre qui utiliser ces armes, car leurs cons?quences sont un aspect important. Une arme pouvant neutraliser un soldat est susceptible de blesser ou de tuer un enfant ou une personne ?g?e. La distance de tir et le nombre de tirs sont autant de facteurs dont il faut tenir compte pour ?valuer l'impact de l'arme. ? titre de comparaison, les armes conventionnelles n'entra?nent la mort "que" dans 25 cas sur 100(12).

Les armes non-l?tales constituent un auxiliaire efficace dans les guerres modernes, qu'elles soient utilis?es s?par?ment ou en m?me temps que des armes conventionnelles. Durant la guerre du Golfe, les ?tats-Unis ont utilis? des armes ? fr?quence radio pour neutraliser le syst?me d'approvisionnement en ?nergie de l'Irak(13), alors que l'on ignorait tout de leurs effets antipersonnel. Ces armes ne constituent donc pas une cat?gorie s?par?e, mais sont une composante d'un syst?me con?u pour tuer.

Le d?veloppement des armes non-l?tales ?largit les options guerri?res. Il en r?sulte une propension accrue ? utiliser la force et non l'inverse. Les armes non-l?tales n'entra?nent pas de conflits ? "z?ro perte".

L'int?r?t que les milieux militaires policiers et politiques portent ? l'essai de ces armes cro?t au rythme de leur diversification. Il ne s'agit pas que des pays du Nord les utilisent comme instrument d'immixtion politique ou de domination contre des pays du Sud.

Ces armes ne sont soumises ? aucune l?gislation efficace. Seule l'interpr?tation de diff?rentes dispositions en mati?re de contr?le des armements permet d'interdire un petit nombre d'armes et de techniques non-l?tales, par exemple, la mousse paralysante (utilis?e en Somalie et en Bosnie). La convention concernant l'utilisation de certaines armes conventionnelles a ?galement limit? l'utilisation de certains types de laser (aveuglant). La convention concernant l'utilisation des armes biologiques interdit le recours aux produits biologiques toxiques (salmonelles et autres bact?ries). Certaines d'entre elles peuvent ?tre d?sastreuses pour l'environnement. En cons?quence, il faut renforcer le droit international afin de r?glementer les armes nouvelles dont le d?veloppement se poursuit en permanence.

Le "projet Cyrus" du Comit? de la Croix Rouge internationale devrait s'appliquer aux armes nonl?tales en l'absence d'autres normes internationales fiables. Ce projet a class? les armes conventionnelles et ?tabli des crit?res en termes de mortalit?, d'invalidit?, de n?cessit? de traitement, de transfusion sanguine, etc. L'Union europ?enne doit faire en sorte que les nouvelles techniques d'armes et le d?veloppement de nouvelles strat?gies d'armement soient, elles aussi, couvertes et r?gies par des conventions internationales.

Armes chimiques

L'action des Nations unies en vue de la destruction des armes chimiques et d'autres armes de destruction massive en Irak a suscit? de graves pr?occupations quant aux incidences environnementales des activit?s militaires et a renforc? la n?cessit? de mettre au point des m?thodes de neutralisation pr?sentant des garanties de s?curit? sur le plan ?cologique. ? l'article 1 de la convention sur l'interdiction des armes chimiques (CWC), entr?e en vigueur en avril 1997, les ?tats parties ? la convention s'engagent ? ne jamais d?velopper, produire ou exporter des armes chimiques quelles que soient les circonstances, ? ne jamais faire usage d'armes chimiques et ? d?truire les armes chimiques courantes. L'article 3 dispose que trente jours apr?s l'entr?e en vigueur de la convention, les ?tats communiquent des informations sur les armes chimiques dont ils disposent, l'endroit o? celles-ci sont entrepos?es et pr?sentent un programme en vue de leur destruction. Les stocks les plus anciens devront ?tre d?truits d'abord. 165 ?tats ont sign? la convention et 110 ont ratifi? celle-ci. 26 ?tats n'ont pas sign? la convention, notamment plusieurs pays importants du Proche-Orient.

La destruction des armes chimiques comporte des aspects tr?s pr?occupants pour l'environnement - elles contiennent des dizaines de milliers de tonnes de gaz moutarde, de gaz neurotoxiques et d'autres produits chimiques. Elles peuvent ?tre d?truites par incin?ration, mais tr?s peu de pays disposent d'installations appropri?es. La neutralisation des armes chimiques est un processus on?reux, trois voire dix fois plus co?teux que leur production. Pour ?tre en mesure de d?truire ses ?normes stocks, la Russie devra recevoir une aide ?conomique d'autres pays. ? Kambarka, une ville de Russie, 6 000 tonnes d'armes chimiques sont entrepos?es dans des abris en bois ? deux kilom?tres d'une agglom?ration. Le traitement de grandes quantit?s de produits dangereux n?cessite des investissements consid?rables. Leur destruction s'?talera sur des ann?es. Il y a ? la fois un risque d'accident et de voir les armes tomber entre de mauvaises mains.

Il a ?t? confirm? que quelque 150 000 tonnes de bombes, d'obus et de mines contenant des armes chimiques, surtout du gaz moutarde, du phosg?ne, du tabun et de l'arsenic ont ?t? immerg?s dans le Skagerack ? la fin de la seconde guerre mondiale. 40 000 tonnes gisent au fond de la Baltique. Bon nombre de conteneurs ont ?t? rong?s par la rouille et les produits chimiques sont en contact direct avec l'eau de la mer. D?cision a ?t? prise de les laisser sur les fonds marins car le risque de perte massive de produit en cas de r?cup?ration est, proportionnellement, beaucoup plus ?lev?.

L'arme nucl?aire

Les cons?quences environnementales d'une guerre nucl?aire seraient ?normes. Il est probable que les effets combin?s des retomb?es radioactives sur une vaste zone, du trou d'ozone cr?? par le dioxyde d'azote lib?r? par les explosions nucl?aires et les modifications climatiques d?clench?es par de gigantesques incendies de longue dur?e entra?neraient des catastrophes environnementales.

Les effets n?fastes des essais nucl?aires sont eux aussi ?vidents. Selon les estimations, la quantit? totale de d?chets radioactifs lib?r?s dans l'atmosph?re durant les essais nucl?aires atmosph?riques est de 100 ? 1 000 fois plus importante que les retomb?es radioactives d?coulant de l'accident de Tchernobyl(14). L'accord partiel sur la limitation des essais nucl?aires conclu en 1963 entre les ?tatsUnis, l'Union sovi?tique et la Grande-Bretagne interdit les essais nucl?aires dans l'atmosph?re dans l'espace et sous l'eau, en l'occurrence dans tous les ?l?ments ? l'exception de la terre.

Depuis 1966, la France a proc?d? ? plus de 180 essais nucl?aire sur l'atoll de Mururoa dans le Pacifique, essais dont les incidences environnementales ont ?t? consid?rables(15). Plusieurs kilos de plutonium dangereux ont ?t? d?couverts dans les couches s?dimentaires des lagons des atolls de Mururoa et de Fangataufa. Des particules de plutonium se sont ?galement r?pandues sur le sol de trois ?les pr?s de Mururoa(16). L'Inde et le Pakistan, viennent d'effectuer des essais nucl?aires(17). Sur le plan technique, ces essais ne semblent pas encore suffisamment contr?l?s, ce qui signifie que leur impact environnemental d?passe largement la r?gion. Une commission d'enqu?te internationale ind?pendante devrait ?tre charg?e sur-le-champ d'examiner les effets environnementaux sur les lieux d'explosion et leurs environs.

Le plutonium est la substance la plus dangereuse que l'on connaisse. Beaucoup de pays d?tiennent d'?normes quantit?s de plutonium militaire. De surcro?t, il est relativement facile de produire des armes nucl?aires au moyen de plutonium "civil". Les installations ? vocation civile peuvent ?tre r?am?nag?es en peu de temps en vue de la production d'armes. La production de plutonium entra?ne une quantit? ?norme de d?chets hautement radioactifs. Le traitement de ces d?chets pose des probl?mes consid?rables.

La fabrication g?n?ralis?e d'armes de destruction massive durant ces derni?res d?cennies a produit des quantit?s ?normes de d?chets. Aucune m?thode n'est efficace lorsqu'il s'agit de stocker des d?chets radioactifs. Ceux-ci sont g?n?ralement plac?s dans des conteneurs, mais des quantit?s ?normes sont aussi d?vers?es dans la nature. Le d?chet radioactif est facilement inflammable et peut exploser en l'absence de ventilation ou de refroidissement. Un accident s'est produit en 1957 ? la centrale nucl?aire de Chelyabinsk-65 pr?s de la ville de Kystym dans l'Oural: un r?servoir rempli de d?chets radioactifs avait explos? et des d?chets s'?taient r?pandus sur une ?tendue de 1 000 km2. 10 000 personnes ont d? ?tre ?vacu?es. Aujourd'hui, au bord du lac Karachay, pr?s de Chelyabinsk-65, la radioactivit? est encore tellement puissante qu'elle peut entra?ner une mort instantan?e(18). Dans la r?gion de la mer Baltique, de vastes zones ont ?t? pollu?es par les activit?s de l'arm?e sovi?tique. En Estonie, le lac Sillanm?, aussi appel? "lac atomique" contient des d?chets radioactifs d'origine militaire, l'?quivalent de milliers d'armes nucl?aires. 100 m s?parent le lac Sillanm? de la Baltique. Toute contamination de la Baltique aurait des cons?quences d?sastreuses pour l'environnement dans toute la r?gion.

? la fin des ann?es 80, la Russie poss?dait plus de sous-marins nucl?aires que tous les autres pays du monde r?unis. La presqu'?le de Kola et Sevrodvinsk, en Russie, abritent aujourd'hui la plus forte concentration de r?acteurs nucl?aires (240)(19) au monde. Des quantit?s ?normes de d?chets radioactifs et d'innombrables sous-marins ? propulsion nucl?aire gisent dans les chantiers navals de Kola. La Russie et sa flotte sont confront?es ? un probl?me insoluble: la gestion des r?acteurs mis au rebut. Sur le plan ?conomique, elles n'ont pas les moyens de financer un d?montage pr?sentant toutes les garanties de s?curit?. La m?diocrit? des salaires a provoqu? l'exode des ?l?ments qualifi?s, de sorte que le personnel des chantiers manque cruellement de comp?tence.

En plein centre de Moscou, ont ?t? d?couvertes 1 200 sources de contamination radioactive, notamment des tas de sable, des abris, des appartements priv?s, des garages et des terrains de sport(20). En Russie, la possibilit? de se procurer des armes nucl?aires, chimiques et biologiques provenant d'entrep?ts militaires ou des substances issues d'instituts de recherche ou de l'industrie ne doit pas ?tre sous-estim?e.

L'absence d'installations appropri?es permettant de traiter les d?chets sans nuire ? l'environnement se fait fortement sentir. Les cons?quences d'un accident pourraient ?tre d?sastreuses, ? la fois pour l'?conomie et l'environnement. Les risques et l'ampleur d'un accident s?rieux ne font que cro?tre ? mesure que les ann?es se succ?dent sans que soient prises des mesures ad?quates.

Il existe une proposition concr?te et r?aliste en vue de la destruction progressive de l'arsenal nucl?aire de la plan?te. Cette proposition a ?t? pr?sent?e en ao?t 1996 par le groupe d'experts ind?pendant qui constituait la commission de Canberra(21). En juillet 1996, la Cour internationale de La Haye proclamait dans un arr?t unanime que l'article 6 du trait? sur la non-prolif?ration des armes nucl?aires obligeait les ?tats nucl?aires ? engager des n?gociations sur le d?sarmement nucl?aire. La Cour de justice a ?galement proclam? que toute menace d'utiliser les armes nucl?aires ou l'utilisation de cellesci ?tait incompatible avec le droit international. L'Union europ?enne doit prendre une part active ? la mise en oeuvre de la proposition de la commission de Canberra et de l'article 6 du trait? sur la nonprolif?ration des armes nucl?aires.

HAARP - Un syst?me d'armement modifiant le climat

Le 5 f?vrier 1998, la sous-commission s?curit? et d?sarmement du Parlement a proc?d? ? une audition portant notamment sur HAARP. Des repr?sentants de l'OTAN et des ?tats-Unis avaient ?t? convi?s ? la r?union. Ils ont toutefois choisi de ne pas venir. La sous-commission a d?plor? que les ?tats-Unis n'aient envoy? aucun repr?sentant ? l'audition et qu'ils n'aient pas saisi l'opportunit? de faire des commentaires sur le mat?riel pr?sent?(22).

HAARP est un programme de recherche sur le rayonnement ? haute fr?quence (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project). Il est conduit conjointement par l'arm?e de l'air et la marine des ?tats-Unis et par l'Institut de g?ophysique de l'universit? d'Alaska ? Fairbanks. Des tentatives analogues ont lieu en Norv?ge, dans l'Antarctique, mais aussi dans l'ex-Union sovi?tique(23). HAARP est un projet de recherche utilisant un ?quipement terrestre, un r?seau d'antennes. Chacune est aliment?e par son propre ?metteur pour r?chauffer des parties de l'ionosph?re(24) au moyen d'ondes radio puissantes. L'?nergie ainsi g?n?r?e r?chauffe certaines parties de l'ionosph?re, ce qui cr?e des trous dans l'ionosph?re et des "lentilles" artificielles.

HAARP peut avoir de multiples applications. La manipulation des particularit?s ?lectriques de l'atmosph?re permet de contr?ler des ?nergies gigantesques. Utilis?e ? des fins militaires contre un ennemi, cette technique peut avoir des cons?quences terribles. HAARP permet d'envoyer ? un endroit d?termin? des millions de fois plus d'?nergie que tout autre ?metteur traditionnel. L'?nergie peut aussi ?tre dirig?e contre un objectif mobile, notamment contre des missiles ennemis.

Le projet am?liore la communication avec les sous-marins et permet de manipuler les conditions m?t?orologiques mondiales. Mais l'inverse, perturber les communications, est ?galement possible. En manipulant l'ionosph?re, on peut bloquer la communication globale tout en conservant ses propres possibilit?s de communications. La radiographie de la terre sur une profondeur de plusieurs kilom?tres (tomographie terrestre p?n?trante) ? la fin de d?couvrir les champs de p?trole et de gaz, mais aussi les ?quipements militaires sous-terrains, et le radar transhorizon qui identifie des objects ? grande distance au-del? de la ligne d'horizon sont d'autres applications du syst?me HAARP.

Depuis les ann?es 50, les ?tats-Unis proc?dent ? des explosions nucl?aires dans les ceintures de Van Allen(25) afin d'examiner les effets des impulsions ?lectromagn?tiques qu'elles d?clenchent sur les communications radio et le fonctionnement des ?quipements radars. Ces explosions ont g?n?r? de nouvelles ceintures de rayonnement magn?tique qui ont pratiquement entour? la terre tout enti?re. Les ?lectrons se d?pla?aient le long de lignes de champs magn?tiques et cr?aient une aurore bor?ale artificielle au-dessus du p?le nord. Ces essais militaires risquent de perturber ? long terme les ceintures de Van Allen. Le champ magn?tique terrestre pourrait s'?tendre sur de vastes zones et emp?cher toute communication radio. Certaines scientifiques am?ricains estiment qu'il faudra plusieurs centaines d'ann?es avant que les ceintures de Van Allen retrouvent leur ?tat initial. HAARP peut bouleverser les conditions climatiques. Tout l'?cosyst?me peut ?tre menac?, en particulier dans l'Antarctique o? il est fragile.

Les trous dans l'ionosph?re caus?s par les ondes radio puissantes qui y sont envoy?es constituent un autre effet tr?s grave d'HAARP. L'ionosph?re est notre bouclier contre le rayonnement cosmique. L'on esp?re que ces trous se refermeront, mais l'exp?rience acquise suite ? la modification de la couche d'ozone donne ? penser le contraire. Le bouclier de l'ionosph?re est fortement perc? ? plusieurs endroits.

En raison de l'ampleur de ces incidences sur l'environnement, HAARP constitue un probl?me global et il faudrait ?valuer si les avantages que procure ce syst?me compensent les risques encourus. Ses incidences ?cologiques et ?thiques doivent ?tre ?valu?es avant la poursuite des travaux de recherche et la r?alisation d'essais. L'opinion publique ignore pratiquement tout du projet HAARP et il est important qu'elle soit mise au courant.

HAARP est li? ? la recherche spatiale intensive men?e depuis 50 ans ? des fins clairement militaires, par exemple en tant qu'?l?ment de la "guerre des ?toiles" en vue du contr?le de la haute atmosph?re et des communications. Ces travaux de recherche doivent ?tre consid?r?s comme extr?mement n?fastes pour l'environnement et la vie humaine. Personne ne sa?t avec certitude ce que peuvent ?tre les effets de HAARP. Il faut lutter contre la politique du secret en mati?re de recherche militaire. Il faut promouvoir le droit ? l'information et au contr?le d?mocratique des projets de recherche militaire ainsi que le contr?le parlementaire.

Une s?rie d'accords internationaux ("la convention sur l'interdiction d'utiliser ? des fins militaires ou ? d'autres fins hostiles des processus modifiant l'environnement, le trait? sur l'Antarctique, l'accord ?tablissant les principes des activit?s des ?tats en mati?re de recherche spatiale, en ce compris la lune et d'autres corps spatiaux ainsi que la convention des Nations unies sur le droit maritime) font que HAARP est un projet hautement contestable non seulement sur les plans humain et politique mais aussi du point de vue l?gal. En vertu du trait? sur l'Antarctique, l'Antarctique ne peut ?tre utilis?e qu'? des fins pacifiques(26), ce qui signifie que HAARP enfreint le droit international. Tous les effets des nouveaux syst?mes d'armement doivent ?tre ?valu?s par des organes internationaux ind?pendants. Il faut encourager la conclusion d'autres accords internationaux afin de prot?ger l'environnement contre toute destruction inutile en temps de guerre.

Incidences des activit?s militaires sur l'environnement

Outre le syst?me d'armement militaire, toutes les activit?s militaires, m?me les manoeuvres en temps de paix ont, d'une mani?re ou d'une autre, des effets n?fastes sur l'environnement. Toutefois, lorsqu'il est question de d?vastation de l'environnement, le r?le de l'arm?e n'est, g?n?ralement, pas ?voqu?; c'est la soci?t? civile qui est la cible de toutes les critiques. Il y a au moins deux explications ? cela(27). Parce qu'elles sont plac?es sous le sceau du secret, les activit?s militaires ne sont pratiquement jamais cit?es, et il est difficile d'opposer le facteur environnement ? l'int?r?t supr?me d'un pays, ? savoir sa s?curit? et sa d?fense.? pr?sent que les catastrophes environnementales et naturelles constituent une menace majeure sur la s?curit?, cet argument devient plus discutable.

L'arm?e se pr?pare dans des conditions les plus r?alistes possibles aux t?ches qui seraient les siennes en cas de conflit. C'est pourquoi ses manoeuvres se d?roulent dans des conditions proches d'une guerre r?elle, ce qui occasionne de graves d?vastations de l'environnement. En t?moignent le retrait des troupes sovi?tiques et les bases militaires abandonn?es par celles-ci en Europe centrale et orientale qui ont fortement endommag? l'environnement local. Les manoeuvres militaires saccagent les sites et d?truisent la vie animale. Elles d?vastent consid?rablement l'environnement de vastes r?gions rurales. La superficie des terrains d'entra?nement pour les tirs d'artillerie et de missiles tactiques augmente. M?me la production d'?quipements militaires et l'industrie fabriquant les produits militaires entra?nent de graves nuisances.

Les militaires sont responsables des ?missions de plusieurs gaz influen?ant le climat, surtout le dioxyde de carbone, mais aussi de l'incin?ration de combustibles fossiles et de l'?mission de CFC qui entra?nent un amincissement de la couche d'ozone(28). Les combustibles utilis?s par les avions ?mettent des substances acides telles que le dioxyde de carbone et l'oxyde de soufre. L'arm?e consomme ?norm?ment de carburant et est responsable d'une large part de la totalit? de la pollution d?coulant des avions(29). Les avions volant ? haute altitude et les missiles sont particuli?rement polluants, tant en termes de nuisances sonores qu'en termes d'?missions. Les gaz d'?missions de tous les missiles utilisant un combustible solide contiennent d'?normes quantit?s d'acide chlorhydrique; chaque vol de la navette spatiale ?met quelque 75 tonnes de chlore qui ira d?truire la couche d'ozone. Le bruit r?sultant de l'utilisation de munitions de gros calibre durant les manoeuvres militaires peut aussi avoir des effets n?faste sur l'environnement.

Les exercices de tirs sont polluants car des ?clats m?talliques sont projet?s dans la nature et d'?normes quantit?s de plomb se r?pandent dans l'environnement suite ? l'utilisation de quantit?s ?normes de munitions de petit calibre contenant du plomb. L'on ne peut que d?plorer l'absence d'informations exhaustives quant ? l'utilisation de m?taux.

L'int?r?t port? aux cons?quences environnementales du d?sarmement est r?cent. Des quantit?s consid?rables de substances explosives sont d?truites chaque ann?e, la plupart de mani?re industrielle. Certains types de munitions, pour diverses raisons, ne

(2 votes)
Cloudseeding7.jpg
28-2-2006 om 16.15u227 viewsChemtrails Baarn - the Netherlands, June 2nd, 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5BQHe2ak4o

The International Space Station (ISS) March 17th, 2009 - Baarn, The Netherlands: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVC3ERtZxSk

CHEMTRAILS! BAARN - SOEST - AMERSFOORT, NEDERLAND - 22 APRIL 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCjtu-wC1og

(2 votes)
Hagelstorm28-2-2005.jpg
UfodeWaarheid.com in Hagelstorm op 28-2-2006 om 14.24u te Eemdijk-Bunschoten.250 views
(2 votes)
ufo1330~0.jpg
UFO watching; a Hanebu or Vimana (India, Egypt)- 1330 AD280 viewsUFOs secretly controlling and guiding humanity througout the 4.5 hundred millennium on this Planet Earth.
(1 votes)
HoeRotsoverPier.jpg
Hoe komt dit Rotsblok dat duizenden kilo's weegt op de Pier terecht, op 15 januari 2006?814 viewsWie weet dat?
Of door de kracht van het Zeewater misschien?
Wie het weet mag het ons melden.

Filmpje; Stromings(Water)kering in het verlengde van de Pier te Ijmuiden in de Noordzee eind augustus 2007: www.ufodewaarheid.com/movie/mov00123.3GP

(13 votes)
AlienAmersfoort.jpg
Stadsring Amersfoort bij de Kei, "an Alienstatue" spotting Chemtrails..773 viewsDit album bevat 14 foto's!
Scroll helemaal naar beneden om alle foto's te bekijken.
De teksten eronder zijn lang, dus het kan even duren voor u de volgende foto tegenkomt, maar ze zijn wel de moeite waard!

PROOF Chemtrails Are Real; Listed by the US-Government as an EXOTIC WEAPON; in the House Of The Representatives, 107th Congress H.R. 2977, Space Presevation Act of 2001 October 2nd. See: www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU9Gul_oTk&NR (1:58sec)

Chemtrails; Hoe ze het doen: van een vliegtuigmonteur van een grote vliegtuigmaatschappij:
Zie: http://www.nulpuntenergie.net/diversen/chemtrails.htm

(16 votes)
A12avenger.2.jpg
Triangle - A12 Avenger1128 viewss.v.p. naar beneden scrollen voor meer interessante foto's en Video.
please scroll down for more interesting pictures and Video.
Have fun!

(11 votes)
caution.jpg
New World Order Monetary System575 viewshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oheM9H5RYWA

Lost in all the Obama furor, the world's leading economic powers ? the so-called G-20 nations ? are quietly laying plans for a November 15th summit in Washington, D.C., that may effect a revolution in world finance and global governance, a revolution with potentially much greater long-term impact on America than anything on President-elect Obama's agenda.

According to an AP report, "EU leaders are set to call on the Nov. 15 summit to agree immediately on five principles: submit ratings agencies to more surveillance; align accounting standards; close loopholes; set banking codes of conduct to reduce excessive risk-taking; and ask the International Monetary Fund to suggest ways of calming the turmoil."

Even discounting the deliberate vagueness of the phrase "closing loopholes," such an agenda obviously contemplates a significant increase in the level of international regulation, presumably to be implemented and enforced by an international regulatory body or bodies. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), created at the Bretton Woods economic summit near the end of World War II, is being touted as the obvious candidate for a global financial regulatory organization. Historically, the IMF's mandate has been far more limited than many of its creators, including British economist John Maynard Keynes (one of the organizers of the Bretton Woods conference), originally envisioned. Keynes and the rest of the British and American delegations to Bretton Woods wanted the agreement to create a global reserve currency (which Keynes wanted to call the bancor), but ended up establishing the dollar as the world's fallback currency instead. They also created the SDR (Special Drawing Right), a quasi-currency in which all acounts at the IMF were and are reckoned.

Now, it appears, the IMF is being primed for a much larger role, to be remade into a bona fide instrument of global governance ? just as the original General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), also created at Bretton Woods, was later transformed into the World Trade Organization (WTO). The latter is a de facto global trade ministry with supranational authority, and it has already wielded over the United States and many other nations.

The IMF, in other words, is apparently being prepared to become for global finance what the WTO has become for international trade. At a recent planning session for the upcoming summit, "[EU leaders] discussed making the International Monetary Fund the world's financial watchdog, suggesting it be given more power to curb financial crises and give more money to aid countries in trouble," the AP reported.

EU leaders like France's President Nicholas Sarkozy and Britain's Prime Minister Gordon Brown have seized the initiative in setting the agenda for the November 15 summit, which some are informally referring to as "Bretton Woods II." The EU will be calling for an agreement to overhaul the global financial system within 100 days, with a second international summit to be held in March.

Additional proposals that may be implied by the aformentioned five agenda items might include: creating a world central bank; creating an international reserve currency to replace the ailing U.S. dollar; and levying fees or taxes on international financial transactions. Any of these would be potentially devastating blows to American sovereignty, and would immeasurably strengthen the UN-centered embryonic world government.

A global central bank with the power to create a truly international currency would give the international system the same power globally that the Federal Reserve enjoys domestically ? the power to create money at will. In other words, the UN system would acquire at a stroke the power to fund itself by printing money, emancipating it from reliance on the contributions of member states. An international tax or fee assessed on financial activity would be the realization of another long-cherished but still-unfulfilled dream of globalists: a truly global tax.

Make no mistake about it: the upcoming series of global summits will be about creating and empowering new organs of world government. It will be about curtailing international economic and financial freedom, not enhancing it.

(7 votes)
monroedorothykilgallen.jpg
Marilyn Monroe and Dorothy Kilgallen 374 viewsMarilyn Monroe and the UFO Conspiracy - Caldbeck England 1954, Project BlueBook and Moon Dust: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-U5-6bB-1s

This eventual released the Marilyn Monroe CIA Memo through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) which was authenticated by the CIA themselves. Within this documents President Kennedy have mentioned a visit to a secret air force base to view ?things from outer space? (UFO information)...allegedly on a document dated 03 August 1962 Marilyn Monroe has came across information and evidence of Roswell UFO Crash and aliens from President Kennedy.

Along with the top US Journalist and TV celebrity Dorothy Kilgallen (also a very close friend of Monroe) who had uncovered crucial evidence of a UFO crash and were about to disclose UFO revelation in a would be joint conference on 14 September 1962.

Information received of the 1954 UFO crash in England at Caldbeck Cumberland was leaked (through her exclusive reporting of the Hydrogen bomb test in Bikini Atoll by a top British diplomat and aristocrat (suspected to be Lord MountBatten along some British official rank)). As she forwarded this in a national press release. She was put under CIA scruitiny and surveillance, and had been put under stress of mental breakdown (evidence of toxic fluoride and LSD traces was in her water supply) which had her stopped on the UFO pursuit. But by 1961 resumed (she had concrete evidence taken from her 1955 investigation).

But by late August 1962 Marilyn Monroe was dead (cancelling the, would be public conference). Dorothy Kilgallen would be found dead in her apartment in Nov 1965 by nearly same circumstances as Marilyn Monroe (silencing the revelation).

Info: On the 4th MARCH 1954, A UFO crash at a crystal minefield at Caldbeck Cumberland England. A gamekeeper and his grandson had witnessed the crash and were detained by the military for two weeks until the wreckage and event was covered up. There was also a poacher who came in contact with the spaceship and two alien with the face of the devil and reported it the local vicar at St Kentigerns. UFO activity was monitored after this day under Operation Mariner on the Irish coast and a near miss was report by a pilot on the Magna Flux Exercise. But until this day hardly anything could be found about this, since the new FOIA by MOD release of new information has still to be seen.

Sources: Raiders News Network, youtube and Wikipedia

Sherry Lee Laird songs:
http://www.songcastmusic.com/albums.php?zoom_query=22415

(7 votes)
300px-Summer_Solstice_Sunrise_over_Stonehenge_2005Chemtrails.jpg
Summer Solstice Sunrise over Stonehenge 2005 and Chemtrails..1001 viewsChemtrails effects: www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBjDSNWiuKQ (2:21)

Earthpulse Press; Chemtrails, H.A.A.R.P. (Angels do not play this kind of haarp), WeatherModification and MindControl, see www.EArthpulse.com/src/category.asp?catid=1

(7 votes)
niBIRU19~0.jpg
Haunebu, foto: George Adamski550 viewswww.gafintl-adamski.com


(7 votes)
Hanebu2-3.JPG
Nazi-Haunebu II-III615 viewsIII; 7000 (Aarde) tot 40.000 km/u (Mars)
(7 votes)
belgium_90_bright_tn.JPG
Belgie UFO Triangle 1989-1990498 viewsTR-3B Astra us Airforce, See:www.youtube.com/profile?user=the50s60s70s
(7 votes)
chemsHilversum24-01-06.jpg
Chemtrails Boven Hilversum678 viewsOp 24 februari 2006 hangen erover heel Hilversum de hele middag Chemtrailsporen in de lucht.
Dit blijkt 's avonds om 18.00u door te lopen tot Paleis Soestdijk. Zie de andere foto's in dit album 55 en zie ook album 9 op pagina 1.


(7 votes)
SUNWEBCHEMTRAILS7.jpg
Paleis Soestdijk 24 februari 2006 om 18.01569 viewswww.earthpulse.com/src/subcategory.asp?catid=1&subcatid=1

Background of the HAARP Project
Prepared by Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH

Military interest in space became intense during and after World War II because of the introduction of rocket science, the companion to nuclear technology. The early versions include the buzz bomb and guided missiles. They were thought of as potential carriers of both nuclear and conventional bombs.

Rocket technology and nuclear weapon technology developed simultaneously between 1945 and 1963. During this time of intensive atmospheric nuclear testing, explosions at various levels above and below the surface of the earth were attempted. Some of the now familiar descriptions of the earth's protective atmosphere, such as the existence of the Van Allen belts, were based on information gained through stratospheric and ionospheric experimentation.

The earth's atmosphere consists of the troposphere, from sea level to about 16 km above the earth's surface; the stratosphere (which contains the ozone level) which extends from about the 16 to 48 km above the earth; and the ionosphere which extends from 48 km to over 50,000 km above the surface of the earth.

The earth's protective atmosphere or "skin" extends beyond 3,200 km above sea level to the large magnetic fields, called the Van Allen Belts, which can capture the charged particles sprayed through the cosmos by the solar and galactic winds. These belts were discovered in 1958 during the first weeks of the operation of America's first satellite, Explorer I. They appear to contain charged particles trapped in the earth's gravity and magnetic fields. Primary galactic cosmic rays enter the solar system from interstellar space, and are made up of protons with energies above 100 MeV, extending up to astronomically high energies. They make up about 100 percent of the high energy rays. Solar rays are generally of lower energy, below 20 MeV (which is still high energy in earth terms). These high energy particles are affected by the earth's magnetic field and by geomagnetic latitude (distance above or below the geomagnetic equator). The flux density of low energy protons at the top of the atmosphere is normally greater at the poles than at the equator. The density also varies with solar activity, being at a minimum when solar flares are at a minimum.

The Van Allen belts capture charged particles (protons, electrons and alpha particles) and these spiral along the magnetic force lines toward the polar regions where the force lines converge. They are reflected back and forth between the magnetic force lines near the poles. The lower Van Allen Belt is about 7700 km above the earth's surface, and the outer Van Allen Belt is about 51,500 km above the surface. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Van Allen belts are most intense along the equator, and effectively absent over the poles. They dip to 400 km over the South Atlantic Ocean, and are about 1,000 km high over the Central Pacific Ocean. In the lower Van Allen Belt, the proton intensity is about 20,000 particles with energy above 30 MeV per second per square centimeter. Electrons reach a maximum energy of 1 MeV, and their intensity has a maximum of 100 million per second per square centimeter. In the outer Belt, proton energy averages only 1 MeV. For compar-ison, most charged particles discharged in a nuclear explosion range between 0.3 and 3 MeV, while diagnostic medical X-ray has peak voltage around 0.5 MeV.

Project Argus (1958)
Between August and September 1958, the US Navy exploded three fission type nuclear bombs 480 km above the South Atlantic Ocean, in the part of the lower Van Allen Belt closest to the earth's surface. In addition, two hydrogen bombs were detonated 160 km over Johnston Island in the Pacific. The military called this "the biggest scientific experiment ever undertaken." It was designed by the US Department of Defense and the US Atomic Energy Commission, under the code name Project Argus. The purpose appears to be to assess the impact of high altitude nuclear explosions on radio transmission and radar operations because of the electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and to increase understanding of the geomagnetic field and the behavior of the charged particles in it.

This gigantic experiment created new (inner) magnetic radiation belts encompassing almost the whole earth, and injected sufficient electrons and other energetic particles into the ionosphere to cause world wide effects. The electrons traveled back and forth along magnetic force lines, causing an artificial "aurora" when striking the atmosphere near the North Pole.

The US Military planned to create a "telecommunications shield" in the ionosphere, reported in 13-20 August 1961, Keesings Historisch Archief (K.H.A.). This shield would be created "in the ionosphere at 3,000 km height, by bringing into orbit 350,000 million copper needles, each 2-4 cm long [total weight 16 kg], forming a belt 10 km thick and 40 km wide, the needles spaced about 100 m apart." This was designed to replace the ionosphere "because telecommunications are impaired by magnetic storms and solar flares." The US planned to add to the number of copper needles if the experiment proved to be successful. This plan was strongly opposed by the Intentional Union of Astronomers.

Project Starfish (1962)
On July 9, 1962, the US began a further series of experiments with the ionosphere. From their description: "one kiloton device, at a height of 60 km and one megaton and one multi-megaton, at several hundred kilometers height" (K.H.A., 29 June 1962). These tests seriously disturbed the lower Van Allen Belt, substantially altering its shape and intensity. "In this experiment the inner Van Allen Belt will be practically destroyed for a period of time; particles from the Belt will be transported to the atmosphere. It is anticipated that the earth's magnetic field will be disturbed over long distances for several hours, preventing radio communication. The explosion in the inner radiation belt will create an artificial dome of polar light that will be visible from Los Angeles" (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). A Fijian Sailor, present at this nuclear explosion, told me that the whole sky was on fire and he thought it would be the end of the world. This was the experiment which called forth the strong protest of the Queen's Astronomer, Sir Martin Ryle in the UK.

"The ionosphere [according to the under-standing at that time] that part of the atmosphere between 65 and 80 km and 280- 320 km height, will be disrupted by mechanical forces caused by the pressure wave following the explosion. At the same time, large quantities of ionizing radiation will be released, further ionizing the gaseous components of the atmosphere at this height. This ionization effect is strengthened by the radiation from the fission products... The lower Van Allen Belt, consisting of charged particles that move along the geomagnetic field lines... will similarly be disrupted. As a result of the explosion, this field will be locally destroyed, while countless new electrons will be introduced into the lower belt" (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). "On 19 July... NASA announced that as a consequence of the high altitude nuclear test of July 9, a new radiation belt had been formed, stretching from a height of about 400 km to 1600 km; it can be seen as a temporary extension of the lower Van Allen Belt" (K.H.A. 5 August 1962).

As explained in the Encyclopedia Britannica: "... Starfish made a much wider belt [than Project Argus] that extends from low altitude out past L=3 [i.e. three earth radiuses or about 13,000 km above the surface of the earth]." Later in 1962, the USSR undertook similar planetary experiments, creating three new radiation belts between 7,000 and 13,000 km above the earth. According to the Encyclopedia, the electron fluxes in the lower Van Allen Belt have changed markedly since the 1962 high- altitude nuclear explosions by the US and USSR, never returning to their former state. According to American scientists, it could take many hundreds of years for the Van Allen Belts to destabilize at their normal levels. (Research done by: Nigel Harle, Borderland Archives, Cortenbachstraat 32, 6136 CH Sittard, Netherlands.)

SPS: Solar Power Satellite Project (1968)
In 1968 the US military proposed Solar Powered Satellites in geostationary orbit some 40,000 km above the earth, which would intercept solar radiation using solar cells on satellites and transmit it via a microwave beam to receiving antennas, called rectennas, on earth. The US Congress mandated the Department of Energy and NASA to prepare an Environmental Impact Assessment on this project, to be completed by June 1980, and costing $25 Million. This project was designed to construct 60 Solar Powered Satellites over a thirty year period at a cost between $500 and $800 thousand million (in 1968 dollars), providing 100 percent of the US energy needs in the year 2025 at a cost of $3000 per kW. At that time, the project cost was two to three times larger than the whole Department of Energy budget, and the projected cost of the electricity was well above the cost of most conventional energy sources. The rectenna sites on earth were expected to take up to 145 square kilometers of land, and would preclude habitation by any humans, animals or even vegetation. Each Satellite was to be the size of Manhattan Island.

Saturn V Rocket (1975)
Due to a malfunction, the Saturn V Rocket burned unusually high in the atmosphere, above 300 km. This burn produced "a large ionospheric hole" (Mendillo, M. Et al., Science p. 187, 343, 1975). The disturbance reduced the total electron content more than 60% over an area 1,000 km in radius, and lasted for several hours. It prevented all telecommunications over a large area of the Atlantic Ocean. The phenomenon was apparently caused by a reaction between the exhaust gases and ionospheric oxygen ions. The reaction emitted a 6300 A airglow. Between 1975 and 1981 NASA and the US Military began to design ways to test this new phenomena through deliberate experimentation with the ionosphere.

SPS Military Implications (1978)
Early review of the Solar Powered Satellite Project began in around 1978, and I was on the review panel. Although this was proposed as an energy program, it had significant military implications. One of the most significant, first pointed out by Michael J. Ozeroff, was the possibility of developing a satellite-borne beam weapon for anti-ballistic missile (ABM) use. The satellites were to be in geosynchronous orbits, each providing an excellent vantage point from which an entire hemisphere can be surveyed continuously. It was speculated that a high-energy laser beam could function as a thermal weapon to disable or destroy enemy missiles. There was some discussion of electron weapon beams, through the use of a laser beam to preheat a path for the following electron beam.

The SPS was also described as a psychological and anti- personnel weapon, which could be directed toward an enemy. If the main microwave beam was redirected away from its rectenna, toward enemy personnel, it could use an infrared radiation wave- length (invisible) as an anti-personnel weapon. It might also be possible to transmit high enough energy to ignite combustible materials. Laser beam power relays could be made from the SPS satellite to other satellites or platforms, for example aircraft, for military purposes. One application might be a laser powered turbofan engine which would receive the laser beam directly in its combustion chamber, producing the required high temperature gas for its cruising operation. This would allow unlimited on-station cruise time. As a psychological weapon, the SPS was capable of causing general panic

The SPS would be able to transmit power to remote military operations anywhere needed on earth. The manned platform of the SPS would provide surveillance and early warning capability, and ELF linkage to submarines. It would also provide the capability of jamming enemy communications. The potential for jamming and creating communications is significant. The SPS was also capable of causing physical changes in the ionosphere

President Carter approved the SPS Project and gave it a go- ahead, in spite of the reservation which many reviewers, myself included, expressed. Fortunately, it was so expensive, exceeding the entire Department of Energy budget, that funding was denied by the Congress. I approached the United Nations Committee on Disarmament on this project, but was told that as long as the program was called Solar Energy by the United States, it could not be considered a weapons project. The same project resurfaced in the US under President Reagan. He moved it to the much larger budget of the Department of Defense and called it Star Wars. Since this is more recent history, I will not discuss the debate which raged over this phase of the plan.

By 1978, it was apparent to the US Military that communications in a nuclear hostile environment would not be possible using traditional methods of radio and television technology (Jane's Military Communications 1978). By 1982, GTE Sylvania (Needham Heights, Massachusetts) had developed a command control electronic sub-system for the US Air Force's Ground Launch Cruise Missiles (GLCM) that would enable military commanders to monitor and control the missile prior to launch both in hostile and non-hostile environments. The system contains six radio subsystems, created with visible light using a dark beam (not visible) and is resistant to the disruptions experienced by radio and television. Dark beams contribute to the formation of energetic plasma in the atmosphere. This plasma can become visible as smog or fog. Some has a different charge than the sun's energy, and accumulates in places where the sun's energy is absent, like the polar regions in the winter. When the polar spring occurs, the sun appears and repels this plasma, contributing to holes in the ozone layer. This military system is called: Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN). (See The SECOMII Communication System, by Wayne Olsen, SAND 78- 0391,Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, April 1978.) This innovative emergency radio system was apparently never implemented in Europe, and exists only in North America.

Orbit Maneuvering System (1981)
Part of the plan to build the SPS space platforms was the demand for reusable space shuttles, since they could not afford to keep discarding rockets. The NASA Spacelab 3 Mission of the Space Shuttle made, in 1981, "a series of passes over a network of five ground based observatories" in order to study what happened to the ionosphere when the Shuttle injected gases into it from the Orbit Maneuvering System (OMS). They discovered that they could "induce ionospheric holes" and began to experiment with holes made in the daytime, or at night over Millstone, Connecticut, and Arecibo, Puerto Rico. They experimented with the effects of "artificially induced ionospheric depletions on very low frequency wave lengths, on equatorial plasma instabilities, and on low frequency radio astronomical observations over Roberval, Quebec, Kwajelein, in the Marshall Islands and Hobart, Tasmania" (Advanced Space Research, Vo1.8, No. 1, 1988).

Innovative Shuttle Experiments (1985)
An innovative use of the Space Shuttle to perform space physics experiments in earth orbit was launched, using the OMS injections of gases to "cause a sudden depletion in the local plasma concentration, the creation of a so called ionospheric hole." This artificially induced plasma depletion can then be used to investigate other space phenomena, such as the growth of the plasma instabilities or the modification of radio propagation paths. The 47 second OMS burn of July 29, 1985, produced the largest and most long-lived ionospheric hole to date, dumping some 830 kg of exhaust into the ionosphere at sunset. A 6 second, 68 km OMS release above Connecticut in August 1985, produced an airglow which covered over 400,000 square km.

During the 1980's, rocket launches globally numbered about 500 to 600 a year, peaking at 1500 in 1989. There were many more during the Gulf War. The Shuttle is the largest of the solid fuel rockets, with twin 45 meter boosters. All solid fuel rockets release large amounts of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust, each Shuttle flight injecting about 75 tons of ozone destroying chlorine into the stratosphere. Those launched since 1992 inject even more ozone-destroying chlorine, about 187 tons, into the stratosphere (which contains the ozone layer).

Mighty Oaks (1986)
In April 1986, just before the Chernobyl disaster, the US had a failed hydrogen test at the Nevada Test Site called Mighty Oaks. This test, conducted far underground, consisted of a hydrogen bomb explosion in one chamber, with a leaded steel door to the chamber, two meters thick, closing within milliseconds of the blast. The door was to allow only the first radioactive beam to escape into the "control room" in which expensive instrumentation was located. The radiation was to be captured as a weapon beam. The door failed to close as quickly as planned, causing the radioactive gases and debris to fill the control room, destroying millions of dollars worth of equipment. The experiment was part of a program to develop X-ray and particle beam weapons. The radioactive releases from Mighty Oaks were vented, under a "licensed venting" and were likely responsible for many of the North American nuclear fallout reports in May 1986, which were attributed to the Chernobyl disaster.

Desert Storm (1991)
According to Defense News, April 13 - 19, 1992, the US deployed an electromagnetic pulse weapon (EMP) in Desert Storm, designed to mimic the flash of electricity from a nuclear bomb. The Sandia National Laboratory had built a 23,000 square meter laboratory on the Kirkland Air Force Base, 1989, to house the Hermes II electron beam generator capable of producing 20 Trillion Watt pulses lasting 20 billionths to 25 billionths of a second. This X-ray simulator is called a Particle Beam Fusion Accelerator. A stream of electrons hitting a metal plate can produce a pulsed X-ray or gamma ray. Hermes II had produced electron beams since 1974. These devises were apparently tested during the Gulf War, although detailed information on them is sparse.

High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, HAARP (1993)
The HAARP Program is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy, and is based in Gakona, Alaska. It is designed to "understand, simulate and control ionospheric processes that might alter the performance of communication and surveillance systems." The HAARP system intends to beam 3.6 Gigawatts of effective radiated power of high frequency radio energy into the ionosphere in order to:

Generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves for communicating with submerged submarines
Conduct geophysical probes to identify and characterize natural ionospheric processes so that techniques can be developed to mitigate or control them
Generate ionospheric lenses to focus large amounts of high frequency energy, thus providing a means of triggering ionospheric processes that potentially could be exploited for Department of Defense purposes,
Electron acceleration for infrared (IR) and other optical emissions which could be used to control radio wave propagation properties
Generate geomagnetic field aligned ionization to control the reflection/scattering properties of radio waves,
Use oblique heating to produce effects on radio wave propagation, thus broadening the potential military applications of ionospheric enhancement technology.
Poker Flat Rocket Launch (1968 to Present)
The Poker Flat Research Range is located about 50 km North of Fairbanks, Alaska, and it was established in 1968. It is operated by the Geophysical Institute with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, under NASA contract. About 250 major rocket launches have taken place from this site, and in 1994, a 16 meter long rocket was launched to help NASA "understand chemical reactions in the atmosphere associated with global climate change." Similar experiments, but using Chemical Release Modules (CRM), have been launched from Churchill, Manitoba. In 1980, Brian Whelan's "Project Waterhole" disrupted an aurora borealis, bringing it to a temporary halt. In February 1983, the chemical released into the ionosphere caused an aurora borealis over Churchill. In March 1989, two Black Brant X's and two Nike Orion rockets were launched over Canada, releasing barium at high altitudes and creating artificial clouds. These Churchill artificial clouds were observed from as far away as Los Alamos, New Mexico.

The US Navy has also been carrying on High Power Auroral Stimulation (HIPAS) research in Alaska. Through a series of wires and a 15 meter antenna, they have beamed high intensity signals into the upper atmosphere, generating a controlled disturbance in the ionosphere. As early as 1992, the Navy talked of creating 10 kilometer long antennas in the sky to generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves needed for communicating with submarines. Another purpose of these experiments is to study the Aurora Borealis, called by some an outdoor plasma lab for studying the principles of fusion. Shuttle flights are now able to generate auroras with an electron beam. On November 10, 1991, and aurora borealis appeared in the Texas sky for the first time ever recorded, and it was seen by people as far away as Ohio and Utah, Nebraska and Missouri. The sky contained "Christmas colors" and various scientists were quick to blame it on solar activity. However, when pressed most would admit that the ionosphere must have been weakened at the time, so that the electrically charged particle hitting the earth's atmosphere created the highly visible light called airglow. These charged particles are normally pulled northwards by the earth's magnetic forces, to the magnetic north pole. The Northern Lights, as the aurora borealis is called, normally occurs in the vortex at the pole where the energetic particles, directed by the magnetic force lines, are directed.

Conclusions
It would be rash to assume that HAARP is an isolated experiment which would not be expanded. It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere.

It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature.

The military implications of combining these projects is alarming.

Basic to this project is control of communications, both disruption and reliability in hostile environments. The power wielded by such control is obvious.

The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening.

The project is likely to be "sold" to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a devise for repairing the ozone layer.

Further References:
C.L. Herzenberg, Physics and Society, April 1994.

R. Williams, Physics and Society, April 1988.

B. Eastlund, Microwave News, May/June 1994.

W. Kofinan and C. Lathuillere, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 14, No. 11, pp 1158-1161, November 1987 (Includes French experiments at EISCAT).

G. Metz and F.W. Perkins. Ionospheric Modification Theory: Past Present and Future, Radio Science, Vo1.9, No. 11, pp 885 -888, November 1974.

(7 votes)
BelgUFOTriangle1989-1990.jpg
Belgie UFO Triangle 1989-1990; the Blackbird, Aurora and TR-3B program (SR 71-75) activated ..274 viewsTR-3B EM-Antigravity using Zero Point Energy (ZPE) spaceships, Belgium UFO-Wave 1991..
(6 votes)
2hanebusonthemoonsurface~0.JPG
2 Hanebus on the surface of the Moon. Photo NASA1165 viewsAmazing UFO shot by the Italian Airforce: www.videogoogle.com/UFOAirForce


My own present opinion, based on two years of careful study, is that UFOs are probably extraterrestrial devices engaged in something that might very tentatively be termed 'surveillance'. ?Dr. James McDonald before Congress, 1968.

Congressional investigations ... are still being held on the

(10 votes)
undergrounboringmachine.jpg
Underground Boring Machine266 views
(5 votes)
stpetersburg1.jpg
TR-3B Astra251 viewsWat zijn de Vliegende Driehoeken? www.ufowijzer.nl/tekstpagina/VliegendeDriehoeken.html
(5 votes)
VR845.jpg
Vril 8 , 1945, gravitational electromotor, speeds a 7000 (on Earth) tot 40.000 km/u (in hyper space to Mars) en meer...477 viewsAccording the Vaimanika Shastra (written in 400 BC by Maharshi Bharadwaj), found in a temple in India in 1875 to some sources, Vimanas said to take off vertically or dirigible. Bharadwaj, the Wise, refers to no less than 70 authorities and 10 experts of air travel in antiquity. These sources are now lost...
(5 votes)
derbyshereufo.jpg
228 views
(5 votes)
siriusufo2009.jpg
389 viewshttp://www.siriusufo.org/istanbul2009/en/default.asp
(9 votes)
russelmeans.jpeg
Russell Means - Republic of Lakotah - Mitakuye Oyasin406 viewshttp://www.republicoflakotah.com/
(9 votes)
V-WH-Poster-a.jpg
We the People 2.0 226 viewswww.givemeliberty.org/rEVOLution

(4 votes)
bruegels.jpg
279 viewshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Babel
Tower of Babel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the Biblical story. For other uses, see Tower of Babel (disambiguation).

Engraving The Confusion of Tongues by Gustave Dor? (1865), who based his conception on the Minaret of Samarra[citation needed]The Tower of Babel (Hebrew: מגדל בבל‎ Migdal Bavel Arabic: برج بابل‎ Burj Babil) is a structure featured in chapter 11 of the Book of Genesis, an enormous tower intended as the crowning achievement of the city of Babilu, the Akkadian name for Babylon. According to the biblical account, Babel was a city that united humanity, all speaking a single language and migrating from the east; it was the home city of the great king Nimrod, and the first city to be built after the Great Flood. The people decided their city should have a tower so immense that it would have "its top in the heavens." (וְרֹאשׁוֹ בַשָּׁמַיִם). However, the Tower of Babel was not built for the worship and praise of God, but was dedicated to false man-made religion[citation needed], with a motive of making a 'celebrated name' for the builders[citation needed]. - Genesis 11:4. God seeing what the people were doing and sinning[citation needed] against him, confused their languages and scattered the people throughout the earth.

Babel is the Hebrew equivalent of Akkadian Babilu (Greek Babylon), a cosmopolitan city typified by a confusion of languages.[1] The Tower of Babel has often been associated with known structures, notably the Etemenanki, the ziggurat to Marduk, by Nabopolassar (610s BC). A Sumerian view of this story is preserved in Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta.

(4 votes)
ufo_March_30_2007.jpg
Great Pyramid Capstone UFO, March 30, 2007261 views
(4 votes)
acc-2-5ufostorecom.jpg
UFO photos $9.95 Photos233 viewswww.theUFOstore.com/
(4 votes)
logo.JPG
Take Action to Stop Fluoridation - Sign the Online Petition256 viewswww.fluoridealert.org

Water en Gezondheid in Nederland

(4 votes)
mercurycontainer.jpg
Mercury Container in UFO - txt333 viewsTR-3B mercury based Triangular plasma circulator is the most exotic aerospace program in existence, Project Aurora TR-3B resembling the Ancient Triangular Mercury based Air Vehicles like in the Vimana Shastra texts etc.
(4 votes)
manta4.jpg
TR-3A Black-Manta211 views
(4 votes)
delta4rocket.jpg
a Boeing Delta 4 Rocket launches from Vandenberg for first time 177 viewsmakes its inaugural West Coast blastoff at 8:33 p.m. June 27 carrying a so called 'classified national security satellite'.
(4 votes)
ChemtrailsSussex-spyplane.JPG
Chemtrails Sussex - BBC news210 views
(4 votes)
cigar.jpg
Sigaarvormige-, Cylindervormige UFO216 views
(4 votes)
200308-RingformetPyramideMars.jpg
Pyramide op Mars320 viewsFoto: credits NASA/JPL/Malin Space Science Systems; august 2003.

Mars, a Way Station; Travel between Earth and Mars by intelligent beings has already been achieved - tens of thousands of years ago and before, according Zecharia Sitchin.

CNN - life on Mars: www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKniI_vNnPs&NR=1

See: www.sitchin.com/nasa_looking.htm

(4 votes)
SunWebChems2~0.jpg
History of weather control223 viewswww.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_control

History of weather control

Witches concoct a brew to summon a hailstorm.Some American Indians had rituals which they believed could induce rain. The Finnish people, on the other hand, were believed by others to be able to control weather. As a result, Vikings refused to take Finns on their oceangoing raids. Remnants of this superstition lasted into the twentieth century, with some ship crews being reluctant to accept Finnish sailors. The early modern era saw people observe that during battles the firing of cannons and other firearms often initiated precipitation. Magical and religious practices to control the weather are attested in a variety of cultures. In Greek mythology, Iphigenia was sacrificed as a human sacrifice to appease the wrath of the goddess Artemis, who had caused the Achaean fleet to be becalmed at Aulis at the beginning of the Trojan War. In Homer's Odyssey, Aeolus, keeper of the winds, bestowed Odysseus and his crew with a gift of the four winds in a bag. However, the sailors open the bag while Odysseus slept, looking for booty, and as a result are blown off course by the resulting gale.[1] In ancient Rome, the lapis manalis was a sacred stone kept outside the walls of Rome in a temple of Mars. When Rome suffered from drought, the stone was dragged into the city.[2] The Berwick witches of Scotland were found guilty of using black magic to summon storms to murder King James VI of Scotland by seeking to sink the ship upon which he travelled.[3] Scandinavian witches allegedly claimed to sell the wind in bags or magically confined into wooden staves; they sold the bags to seamen who could release them when becalmed.[4] In various towns of Navarre, prayers petitioned Saint Peter to grant rain in time of drought. If the rain was not forthcoming, the statue of St Peter was removed from the church and tossed into a river.[5]

Perhaps the first example of practical weather control is the lightning rod. In the 1950s, computer scientist John von Neumann, an early theorizer on weather control, surmised that if Earth were to enter another Ice Age, a preventative solution would be to dump dirt (or spray soot from cropdusting planes) on the surface of the planet's glaciers. He noted that this would significantly change their reflectivity (albedo), and thus increase the solar energy retained by the planet. Such a strategy would require repeated applications, as storms would cover some portion of the soot with new snow until their frequency and range abated. The theoretical efficacy of von Neumann's proposal remains to be examined. Wilhelm Reich performed cloudbusting experiments in the 1950s to 1960s, the results of which are controversial. Dr Walter Russell wrote of weather control in Atomic Suicide 1956. Jack Toyer 1970s building a rainmaker Palmers Island near Grafton using Mirror Solar radiations Electromagnetic Static charge and infra red frequencies of Light to induce weather in regional areas within Australia interviewed by Mike Willise and George Negus in 1980s continued work by remainder man Peter Stevens 1980s through 2000s


[edit] Cloud seeding for rain
Cloud seeding is a common technique intended to trigger rain, but evidence on its effectiveness is mixed. Critics generally contend that claimed successes occur in conditions which were going to rain anyway. It is used in several different countries, including the United States, the People's Republic of China, and Russia. In the People's Republic of China there is a perceived dependency upon it in dry regions, which believe they are increasing annual rainfall by firing silver iodide rockets into the sky where rain is desired. In the United States, dry ice or silver iodide may be injected into a cloud by aircraft, or from the ground, in an attempt to increase rainfall; some companies are dedicated to this form of weather modification.


[edit] Storm prevention
Project Stormfury was an attempt to weaken tropical cyclones by flying aircraft into storms and seeding the eyewall with silver iodide. The project was run by the United States Government from 1962 to 1983. A similar project using soot was run in 1958, with inconclusive results.[6] Various methods have been proposed to reduce the harmful effects of hurricanes. Moshe Alamaro of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology[7] proposed using barges with upward-pointing jet engines to trigger smaller storms to disrupt the progress of an incoming hurricane; critics doubt the jets would be powerful enough to make any noticeable difference.[6]

Alexandre Chorin of the University of California at Berkeley proposed dropping large amounts of environmentally friendly oils on the sea surface to prevent droplet formation.[8] Experiments by Kerry Emanuel[9] of MIT in 2002 suggested that hurricane-force winds would disrupt the oil slick, making it ineffective.[10] Other scientists disputed the factual basis of the theoretical mechanism assumed by this approach.[11] The Florida company Dyn-O-Mat proposes the use of a product it has developed, called Dyn-O-Gel, to reduce the strength of hurricanes. The substance is a powder which reportedly has the ability to absorb 1,500 times its own weight in water. The theory is that it is dropped into clouds to remove their moisture. When the gel reaches the ocean surface, it is reportedly dissolved. The company has tested the substance on a thunderstorm, but there has not been any scientific consensus established as to its effectiveness.[12] Hail cannons are used by some farmers in an attempt to ward off hail, but there is no reliable scientific evidence to confirm or deny their effectiveness. Another new anti-hurricane technology [1] is a method for the reduction of tropical cyclones? destructive force - pumping sea water and diffused in the wind at the bottom of such tropical cyclone in its eyewall.


[edit] Ionospheric experiments
HIPAS has several diverse experimental facilities: a 1-megawatt rf transmitter to produce ELF/VLF (Extremely Low Frequency and Very Low Frequency) electromagnetic (EM) generation by the absorption of radio frequency (rf) power in the arctic ionosphere including ion cyclotron excitation; a 100 kW rf plasma torch used in research on the destruction of hazardous waste; a 2.7 m liquid mirror telescope used with one of several lasers for ionospheric stimulation and measurement; an Incoherent Scatter Radar (a new project using 88 ft. diameter antenna at NOAA Gilmore Creek site 34 km SW of HIPAS as the receiving antenna with the transmitter at HIPAS). HIPAS is in the process of adding a very high power (terawatt) laser (recently obtained from LLNL) to perform laser breakdown experiments in the ionosphere. Two Diesel electric generators (1500 HP 4160 V, 3-phase, 1.2 MVA each) are used to power the experiments. There are a number of computers (PC's ) on site, and a high-speed data line to UAF is available. While these experiments are useful in measuring the properties of the ionosphere, they produce insufficient amounts of energy to modify it in any significant way.

Atmospheric Ionization Research Association Incorporated in 2007 in Australia began reworking Jack Toyers machine principals (http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=-9102682294862253229) with operations in regional Queensland Chincilla 2006, Kilcoy 2006, Dalby 2007, Sapphire 2007, Calliope 2007. New South Wales Casino 2006-2008,Lismore 2006-2008 Bourke 2007. Arizona Phoenix 2007-2008, Death Valley 2007 December 2007 dedication to Jack Toyer,Lao and Dr Walter Russells work in Virginia at Swannonoa Palace estate operating in USA , Mobile to travel to sites with a great deal of Success within the Target Area's this Science Phenomena of Rain from Blue Skies and Many other Videos on Google(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-8sVWfmWb8)


[edit] Weather control and law
This article or section deals primarily with the United States and does not represent a worldwide view of the subject.
Please improve this article or discuss the issue on the talk page.


[edit] 1977 Environmental Modification Convention
Main article: Environmental Modification Convention
Weather control, as well as "weather tampering", for hostile or military purposes is expressly forbidden dating from at least December 10, 1976, when the "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, TIAS 9614 Convention[13] on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques" was adopted. The Convention was: Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977; Entered into force October 5, 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980.[14]


[edit] 2005 U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995
U.S. Senate Bill 517[15] and U.S. House Bill 2995[16] were two laws proposed in 2005 that would have allowed experimental weather modification by artificial methods, established a Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and implemented a national weather modification policy. Neither ever became law.


[edit] Future aspirations
Climatologist Ross Hoffman has simulated hurricane control based on selective heating and cooling (or prevention of evaporation).[17] Futurist John Smart has discussed the potential for weather control via space-based solar power networks. One proposal involves the gentle heating via microwave of portions of large hurricanes. Such chaotic systems may be susceptible to "side steering" with a few degrees of increased temperature/pressure at critical points. A sufficient network might keep the largest and most potentially damaging hurricanes from landfall, at the request of host nations. Blizzards, monsoons, and other extreme weather are also potential candidates for space-based amelioration.[citations needed] If large-scale weather control were to become feasible, potential implications may include:

Unintended side effects, especially given the chaotic nature of weather development
Damage to existing ecosystems
Health risks to humans
Equipment malfunction or accidents
Non-democratic control or use as a weapon
For the 2008 Olympics, the Chinese have set aside 30 airplanes, 4,000 rocket launchers, and 7,000 anti-aircraft guns to stop rain. The Chinese plan to shoot various chemicals into any threatening clouds to shrink rain drops before they reach the stadium.[18]


[edit] Weather control in popular culture
In popular culture, weather control technology can be encountered in the realms of public speculation, science fiction, and fantasy. The concept of weather control is often portrayed as a part of terraforming.


[edit] Film and television

[edit] Star Trek
In the Star Trek universe, most advanced planets and colonies utilize weather control, often referred to as weather modification grids or weather modification nets. A small, but long-established TNG-era (ca 2369) colony was a weather control facility for approximately a hundred years. Most advanced civilizations apparently employ weather control standard equipment.
Weather control technology in 2270s required special facilities, modern TNG- and DS9-era technology consists of multiple mid-size devices positioned strategically, networked and controlled from more-or-less arbitrary places.
For example, the planet Risa has its climate controlled to be a tropical paradise. Perhaps one of the few modern exceptions of planets apparently without weather control technology is Ferenginar with continuous rain. (It could be the weather control is set for never ending rain, or is expensive to maintain.)

[edit] Other films or shows
In the SciFi Channel Original Series, Stargate SG1, Episode 214, "Touchstone", aired on October 30, 1998, the Stargate SG1 team discovers a weather control device on an alien planet, which is subsequently stolen and brought to earth, where experimenting with it wreaked havoc with the local weather. The device was later recaptured and returned to its original planet which had suffered phenominal storms since it had been stolen.
In the Disney Channel Original Movie, The Ultimate Christmas Present, two girls find a weather machine and make it snow in Los Angeles.
In the live action Justice League of America film, the villain is a terrorist who has a weather control device.
In Aliens, a colony sent to LV-426 by the Company utilized a fusion-powered terraforming atmosphere processor. In the first film, the planet's climate was not yet suitable for human life.
In the 1987 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoon series, the episode "Hot Rodding Teenagers from Dimension X" includes Stone Warriors using a "weather satellite", with one difference: while other weather satellite gives weather prognosis, this one "makes weather". The "weather satellite" creates a storm to level New York City, but the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles destroy it. The episode "Take Me to Your Leader" of the same series include Krang and the Shredder using a machine to reduce the Sun, creating cold weather on the Earth.
Storm (played by Halle Berry), a member of the X-Men, can control the weather with her mind.
In Superman III, Gus Gorman (Richard Pryor) changes the weather by hacking into a weather satellite.
In a Family Guy episode, Stewie builds a machine that can control the weather using only a satellite dish and a See 'n Say.
In the film The Avengers Sir August de Wynter (Sean Connery) creates a satellite capable of controlling the weather.
Our Man Flint is a 1966 sci-fi action film which stars James Coburn as Derek Flint where a trio of mad scientists attempt to blackmail the world with a weather-control machine.
Kaij?t? no kessen: Gojira no musuko is a 1967 film from Japan. Scientists, on a tropical island, conduct weather control experiments then encounter gigantic praying mantises and a giant spider that attack the son of Godzilla. Godzilla arrives and saves his offspring.
The cartoon miniseries G.I. Joe: The Revenge of Cobra, showed the terrorist group Cobra in possession of a device called the Weather Dominator.

[edit] Computer games
In Master Of Orion, it is possible to build a weather control building to change the planet's environment.
In Command & Conquer: Red Alert 2, the Allies can build the weather controller device superweapon, and direct thunderstorms to strike a selected location of the map every 10 game minutes.
In Phantasy Star II, a weather, irrigation and dam control system known as Climatrol has been constructed by Mother Brain to make the barren planet Motavia habitable for Palman occupation.
In the forthcoming game Spore by Will Wright, players will be able to use a spacecraft to modify planetary atmospheres - creating volcanoes to generate carbon dioxide, seeding plant life to create breathable air, or even using a "Genesis device" to make a planet habitable in one go.[19]

[edit] Prose
Ben Bova's "The Weathermakers" is the story of a government agency that controls the weather.
Sydney Sheldon's "Are You Afraid of the Dark" is the story of a think tank that builds technology powerful enough to create hurricanes, tornadoes, and tsunamis.
In Michael Crichton's "State of Fear," ecoterrorists plan to create a tsunami, calve an iceberg, and induce flash flooding and hurricanes.
In Normand Lester?s science Thriller Verglas, the 1998 icestorm that struck the Montr?al area is an experiment by the Pentagon in the development of a climatic weapon that went wrong. The book speculate that ULF waves generated by a transmitter at Siple Station, a US base in Antarctica, caused the icestorm by affecting the ionosphere over Qu?bec.
In Lois Lowry's "The Giver," the government controls the weather and keeps it from snowing, and confine rain to the farmland.
In the book series Weather Warden by Rachel Caine, the Wardens are an association of people who have the ability to control the elements - earth, fire and weather. They manipulate these elements to stop natural disasters from devastating mankind. The main character herself is a Weather Warden, so weather manipulation plays a large role throughout the series.
In Roger Zelazny's The Chronicles of Amber an openly known quality of the Jewel of Judgment is the ability to control the local weather.
In Frank Herbert's Dune series, weather control is widespread, and is achieved with specialized satellites in orbit around a planet.

[edit] Music
cloudbusting by Kate Bush

[edit] Other fictional weather controllers
DC Comics villain Weather Wizard could control the weather with a special kind of technology in the shape of a wand.
Marvel Comics heroes Thor and Storm could control weather; the former because he is the Norse god of thunder, the latter because she is a mutant whose powers specifically center around weather control.
Digimon character Wizardmon could manipulate thunderstorms.
When the Muppet Count von Count of Sesame Street laughs, it often invokes thunder.
In some of the Asterix comics, when the village bard Cacofonix sings, it starts to rain.

[edit] Conspiracy theories
Conspiracy theorists have suggested that certain governments use or seek to use weather control as a weapon (eg via HAARP and/or chemtrails), but such allegations have not been proven. At a counterterrorism conference in 1997, United States Secretary of Defense William Cohen referred to the writings of futurist Alvin Toffler, specifically regarding concerns about "eco-terrorism" and intentionally caused natural disasters.[20]


[edit] See also
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP)
Weather Modification Operations and Research Board
Global warming
Weather forecasting
Hail cannon
Operation Popeye
Beijing Weather Modification Office
Space Preservation Act
Bernard Eastlund

[edit] References
^ Homer, The Odyssey, book 10.
^ Sir James Frazer, The Golden Bough, ch. 5 (abridged edition), "The Magical Control of Rain"
^ Smout, T. C. A History of the Scottish People 1560-1830, pp 184 - 192
^ Adam of Bremen and Ole Worm are quoted as maintaining this in Grillot de Givry's Witchcraft, Magic and Alchemy (Frederick Publications, 1954).
^ Frazer, supra.
^ a b http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn7995.html - Alamaro proposal and energy critique
^ Moshe Alamaro's brief bio
^ http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7726 - Chorin proposal
^ Kerry Emanuel's Homepage
^ Could humans tackle hurricanes? - earth - 14 September 2005 - New Scientist Environment
^ Oil on troubled waters may stop hurricanes - earth - 25 July 2005 - New Scientist
^ Anti-hurricane invention worth pursuing. Murdock, Deroy. Scripps Howard News Service. 22 Oct 2005.
^ Environmental Modification Convention
^ "Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques", United States Department of State. Retrieved on 2007-09-28.
^ S. 517 [109th]: Weather Modification Research and Development Policy Authorization Act of 2005 (GovTrack.us)
^ H.R. 2995 [109th]: Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2005 (GovTrack.us)
^ Hoffman, R, "Controlling Hurricanes," Scientific American, Oct 2004.
^ Demick, Barbara, "China plans to halt rain for Olympics," Los Angeles Times, January 2008.
^ "Terraforming". SporeNormous (2008). Retrieved on 2008-07-04.
^ COHEN ADDRESS 4/28 AT CONFERENCE ON TERRORISM Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy Sam Nunn Policy Forum April 28, 1997 University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

[edit] External articles and further reading

[edit] General information
Weather Modification Association Perhaps the largest commercial overhead organization for weather modification research and application.
Golden Dome construction Hundreds of advanced practitioners of Transcendental Meditation put their attention on favorable weather conditions during construction of the Golden Dome during the winter of 1980.
The Testimony of Dr. Tom DeFelice (Past President, Weather Modification Association) in support of Weather Modification Operations and Research Board
109th Congress S. 517: Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2005
Article Montana restricts spraying to a window of months and requires materials and employee lists
US Navy Some work is done by The United States Navy using ELF: Simulations of ELF radiation generated by heating the high-latitude D- region. (This work is supported by the Office of Naval Research and, in part, by a grant of HPC time from the DoD High Performance Computing Center at the Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground)
HARRP
"The Weather Modification Operations and Research Board (passed Oct.2005) - in corporate cooperation with BAE Systems (HAARP apparatus & facility owner) and Raytheon Corporation (HAARP patent owner)
"NOAA?S NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE AWARDS $300 MILLION AWIPS CONTRACT TO RAYTHEON"
"Raytheon Aircraft Company (Owner of HAARP patents, and, NOAA-funded aerosol weather modification/AESA radar weather weapons)"
"BAE Systems (program and apparatus-owner of the HAARP facility, Railgun technology, electromagnetic armor, and, a sub-corporation partner with Raytheon via British Aerospace Corporation
"General Dynamics Robotics (owned by Raytheon Corp) - military contractor/manufacturer of Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles (UAV) aircraft designed for "all-weather," computer-controlled weapons defense progams
"HAARP Completed! - news compilation
"President Bush's National Response Plan"
"Boeing, Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, and Raytheon to create B2B exchange for the aerospace and defense industry, powered by Microsoft"
Weathermodification.org
North American Interstate Weather Modification Council
Iceflares.com
The Gateway Arch as a weather control device
William Cohen Address of 4/28/1997 where he mentioned the possibility of "eco-terrorism" including weather control.
Scientific American Magazine (October 2004 Issue) Controlling Hurricanes
Weather control video's and info
Eastlund Scientific Enterprises The established corporation of Bernard Eastlund, the inventor of the fusion torch, patents used for the HAARP, and the weather-modifying "Thunderstorm Solar-Powered Satellite" system.
Whitehouse.gov The "National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive" of 2007, in which "The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government" (powers of legislative and judiciary branches aside) during any sort of catastrophic emergency in the USA.

[edit] Patents
Original
Process for weather control, H. M. Brandau, U.S. Patent 2,756,097
Weather control by artificial means, Heinz W. Kasemir, U.S. Patent 3,284,005
Cloud formation and subsequent moisture precipitation, U.S. Patent 3,409,220
System and method for irradiation of planet surface areas, Aurthur G. Buckingham, U.S. Patent 3,564,253
Weather modification method, Knollenberg, U.S. Patent 3,613,992
Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process, Consiglio Nazionale delle Richerche, U.S. Patent 3,630,950
Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere, J. Eastlund, U.S. Patent 4,686,605
Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water, Slavko Mentus, U.S. Patent 5,360,162
Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth's weather, Franklin Y. K. Chen, U.S. Patent 5,762,298
Weather modification by artificial satellites, Franklin Y. K. Chen, U.S. Patent 5,984,239
Reissue
Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process, Consiglio Nazionale delle Richerche, U.S. Patent RE29,142
[show]v ? d ? eGlobal warming and climate change


(4 votes)
orbwarpuntcomsite.jpg
2 strange formations of Orbs traverse the skies of North-West Madrid, Spain. [Jan. 2006]379 viewswww.orbwar.com/large-video-clip-dual-formations-ufo-spheres-orb-satellites.htm

www.orbwar.com

(7 votes)
A12avenger.jpg
Triangle - A12 Stealth Avenger1218 views..the secreting away of a technology that would free humanity immediately from its - planned - wretched state.

According to company documents seen by the respected journal Jane's Defence Weekly, Boeing is investigating Podkletnov?s claims to have built an "impulse gravity generator".
Dr. Paul Laviolette disclosed the existence of a classified 2007 study called [G.R.A.S.P.] or [Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion] in his book ?Secrets of Antigravity?.
Obama?s National Security Advisor James L. Jones worked for Boeing on this project and has already begun the disclosure process by declassifying Electro-Gravity (Biefeld-Brown).

(10 votes)
JetCreatingSonicBoom.jpg
Jet creating Sonic boom1450 views
(12 votes)
DSC00352.JPG
Mayo 2004 - CD Juarez, Mexico246 views
(3 votes)
GilgameshTabletDelugeAkkadian-wikipedia.jpg
Tablet216 views
(3 votes)
finlandKustavi2004sept23.jpg
Kustavi, Finland - 2004226 views
(3 votes)
guernseytriangle.jpg
Guernsey UFO France - UK; Tr-3b Triangular Vehicle?184 views
(3 votes)
triangleundergroundHimalay~0.jpg
Triangle 247 viewsIn early 1992 a number of houses (+/- 25) in the northern Netherlands were damaged as a result of a sonic boom. However, there were no aircraft reported in the region that could have caused the boom . . . A Dutch newspaper suggested it came from a top secret plane temporarily based in Scotland for testing.

See the Aurora Aircraft Page: www.wave.prohosting.com/aurora85/

(3 votes)
ufoarea51~0.jpg
242 views
(3 votes)
imagesCAH7MJL4.jpg
180 views
(3 votes)
200px-White_horse_from_air.jpg
White Horse of Uffington273 viewsLanding Mark for Anunna-spaceships, those from Nibiru, Mars=Lahmu, and Earth=Gaya.
More info: www.sitchin.com

(3 votes)
ChemsII.jpg
215 viewsOur scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men.
Martin Luther King Jr., Strength to Love, 1963

(3 votes)
Kuddurru-of-the-Babylonian-King-Marduk-Zakir-Shumi-Iran-Late-Assyrian-Period-circa-850-BC-Zakir-Shumi-KudurruMarduk.jpg
Kuddurru of the Babylonian King Marduk [First Son of EA] -Zakir-Shumi, Iran, Late Assyrian Period, circa 850 BC919 viewsZecharia Sitchin - A talk from the Heart 2006 - 6/6: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryqCdS8frl8&feature=related


The first century b.c.e. historian-geographer Strabo, who was born in a Greek town in Asia Minor, described Babylon in his famed Geography?its great size, the ?hanging garden? that was one of the Seven Wonders of the World, its high buildings constructed of baked bricks, and so on, and said this in section 16.I.5 (emphasis added):

Here too is the tomb of Belus, now in ruins,
Having been demolished Xerxes, as it is said,
It was a quadrangular pyramid of baked bricks,
Not only being a stadium in height,
But also having sides a stadium in length,
Alexander intended to repair this pyramid;
But it would have been a large task
And would have required a long time,
So that he could not finish what he had attempted.

According to this source, the tomb of Bel/Marduk was destroyed by Xerxes, who was the Persian king (and ruler of Babylon) from 486 to 465 b.c.e. Strabo, in Book 5, had earlier stated that Belus was lying in a coffin when Xerxes decided to destroy the temple, in 482 b.c.e. Accordingly, Marduk died not long before (Germany?s leading Assyriologists, meeting at the University of Jena in 1922, concluded that Marduk was already in his tomb in 484 b.c.e.). Marduk?s son Nabu also vanished from the pages of history about the same time. And thus came to an end, an almost human end, the saga of the gods who shaped history on planet Earth.

That the end came as the Age of the Ram was waning was probably no coincidence, either.
With the death of Marduk and the fading away of Nabu, all the great Anunnaki gods who had once dominated Earth were all gone; with the death of Alexander, the real or pretended demigods who linked Mankind to the gods were also gone. For the first time since Adam was fashioned, Man was without his creators.

In those despondent times for Mankind, hope came forth from Jerusalem.
Amazingly, the story of Marduk and his ultimate fate in Babylon had been correctly foretold in biblical prophecies. We have already noted that Jeremiah, while forecasting a crushing end for Babylon, made the distinction that its god Bel/Marduk was only doomed to ?wither??to remain, but to grow old and confused, to shrivel and die. We should not be surprised that it was a prophecy that came true.
But as Jeremiah correctly predicted the final downfall of Assyria, Egypt, and Babylon, he accompanied those predictions with prophecies of a reestablished Zion, of a rebuilt temple, and of a ?happy end? for all nations at the End of Days. It would be, he said, a future that God had planned ?in his heart? all along, a secret that shall be revealed to Mankind (23:20) at a predetermined future time: at the End of Days you shall perceive it? (30: 24), and ?at that time, they shall call Jerusalem Yahweh?s Throne, and all nations shall assemble there (3: 17).
Isaiah, in his second set of prophecies (sometimes called the Second Isaiah), identifying Babylon?s god as the ?Hiding god??which is what ?Amon? meant?foresaw the future in those words:

Bel is bowed down, Nebo is cowered,
Their images are loads for beasts and cattle...
Together they stoopeth, they bowed down,
Unable to save themselves from capture.
ISAIAH 46:1-2

These prophecies, as did Jeremiah?s, also contained the promise that Mankind will be offered a new beginning, new hope; that a Messianic Time will come when ?the wolf shall dwell with the lamb.? And the Prophet said, ?it shall come to pass at the End of Days, that the Mount of Yahweh?s Temple shall be established as foremost of all mountains, exalted above all hills; and all the nations shall throng unto it.?; it will be then that the nations ?shall beat their swords into ploughshares and their spears into pruning hooks, nation shall not lift up sword against nation, and they will no longer teach war? (ISAIAH 2:1-4).

From ?The End of Days, Armageddon and Prophecies of the Return?, by ZECHARIA SITCHIN, bestselling author of the 12th Planet. (See page 261-263)

Reprinted with permission. Copyright Z. Sitchin

WWW.SITCHIN.COM


(8 votes)
H3~0.jpg
Anti-gravity deep spaceship, Moon, Mars +Nibiru: Haunebu 3 , Mach 40599 viewsUFOs of the Elite's part 1: www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6JfB4bBgFE&mode=related&search= (9:34)
(8 votes)
chemtrailssporen.jpg
Shift of Consciousness..636 viewsChemtrails, HAARP en Globalwarming: www.indymedia.be/en/node/7464

Chemtrails bevestigt door Canadese en US Officials: www.portland.indymedia.org/en/2002/06/12850.shtml

A scientist working at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base told Columbus Alive (Dec. 6, 2001) that two different chemtrails projects are currently being conducted by the U.S. military. One involves creating clouds to cool global warming.

Chemtrails are also being deployed by the Pentagon to suspend a mixture of barium stearate and fine iron particles as a temporary atmospheric antenna for conducting radio and radar waves over the horizon. The soapy stearate used to carry the airborne iron particles appears in the sky as prismatic bands of color.

Barium-iron chemtrails were reportedly used to create long range radio-and-radar "ducting" during sustained air strikes on Iraq, Kosovo, and Afghanistan. The scientist interviewed by Fitzrakis also stated that barium chemtrails are being used in conjunction with an "atmospheric heater" called HAARP in Gakon, Alaska.

HAARP's inventor Bernard Eastland told this reporter that the principal purpose of this multi-million watt weapon is to "steer the jet stream" and change the weather. His patent calls for spraying barium in the atmosphere to enhance the effects of HAARP. "Wright-Pat has long been deeply engaged in HAARP's electromagnetic warfare program," Eastlund told Columbus Alive.

/h3>
If some of the chemtrails being sprayed overhead contain compounds for conducting electromagnetic energy, residents of all affected communities could be in even graver danger from the intense electromagnetic radiation emitted by cellphone and microwave transmitter towers, radar installations at military bases, high-voltage power lines, high-power military relay towers and myriad other well-documented sources of "electronic smog" - 15 million times more intense than natural background levels.

Barium chemtrails could accidentally amplify these already hazardous electromagnetic emanations.

Canadian military officers at Canadian Forces Base Comox spokesmen have heatedly denied the existence of this joint military operation. But Terry Stewart told the Vancouver Courier (Aug. 15, 2001) that his information confirming the Canada-U.S. military exercise came directly from CFB Comox.


- # - # - # -

Veteran reporter William Thomas has covered stories suppressed by the mainstream media for more than 30 years. He is the award-winning author of Scorched Earth, Bringing The War Home, Probing The Chemtrails Conundrum, Alt. Health, All Fall Down: The Politics of Terror and Mass Persuasion. His video documentaries include "Eco War", "Waterwise" and "Chemtrails: Mystery Lines In The Sky".
eastlund science, project 3http://www.europarl.europa.eu/dg3/sdp/backg/en/1998/b980209.htm#1Background information : 09-02-98
The HAARP Project and nonb-lethal weapons
Brussels, 9th February 1998






The HAARP Project and nonb-lethal weapons





The HAARP project and non-lethal weapons.

Experts alarmed - public debate needed.


The hearing on the HAARP project and non-lethal weapons was held in connection with a European Parliament own-initiative report, to be drawn up by Maj Britt THEORIN (PES, S), on the possible use of military resources in environmental strategies.

Non-lethal (or non-deadly) weapons - a varied scenario
As Peter TRUSCOTT (PES, UK) said in his introduction, "There is an invisible line between what is acceptable and what is suspect". This is the nub of the issue.


Non-lethal weapons constitute a trend in military thinking which has developed since the end of the Cold War. The world is dealing with a different sort of crisis, which is less easily identifiable and less easy to manage with traditional methods and weapons - hence the desire to master the violence by means other than the same violence. Non- lethal weapons are compared by some authors to "straitjackets" and defined as "any action capable of modifying the behaviour of the adversary while avoiding his annihilation". This appears to be a significant element of crisis prevention but can be - and is - also used in civilian situations (e.g. crowd control).


Mr Luc MAMPAEY, a researcher at GRIP, the Brussels-based European institute for research and information into peace and security, said he believed the expression "non-lethal weapons" was semantically contentious. He argued that the term had reassuring connotations. It was the politically correct term, and one which could delude the public into thinking that nowadays a clean war was possible and hence morally acceptable. In fact, as he himself and the Red Cross representative, Mr Robin COUPLAND (Geneva), pointed out, the dividing line between deadly and non-deadly weapons was not clear. Some weapons might result in death, while others could incapacitate their victims permanently or temporarily. Mr COUPLAND was quite categorical: the term "non-deadly", he said, was ultimately a marketing slogan.


The problem of definition "by default" led all the experts to stress that there was no single type of non-lethal weapon and that a careful distinction must be made between the various types, from the simplest to the most sophisticated. These new weapons covered a broad spectrum of technologies, from optical systems with a dazzling or blinding effect, through sound and electro- magnetic waves, chemical, medicinal, adhesive, slippery, super-caustic and acidic substances, biological agents, bacteria and micro-organisms, to rubber bullets and electric-shock batons.


Dangers to health and the environment


The effects on health and the environment were also described as variable. Any weapon designed to disrupt an organism, as well as weapons capable of affecting an organism indirectly, by chemical or biological means, or optical, acoustic or neurological stimuli, could become fatal under certain conditions. Adhesive foam, it was said, could also have extremely dangerous side- effects.


Only if a precisely calculated dose were perfectly delivered could it be guaranteed that sensory (or xenobiotic) stimuli would not have irreversible, or indeed, fatal effects. In practice, this perfect control over the degree of disruption was the first thing likely to go by the board under extreme conditions, where the desire for a swift and decisive solution would rapidly override considerations of ethics or toxicology.


The risk of abuse in democratic societies


However, it was argued, health and environmental issues were not the only concerns raised by the use of non-lethal weapons. Mr COUPLAND expressed concern about an overlap of civil, police and military applications. He was also afraid that these weapons might be used not to replace conventional weapons but in addition to them.


In Mr MAMPAEY's view, as non-lethal weapons developed, links were bound to be created between military and law-and-order operations, which, he said, would enable certain current conventions to be bypassed. There was a danger of growing militarisation of domestic police forces, which would have access to more sophisticated weaponry. This could raise problems in any state which was supposed to be based on the rule of law and to be mindful of human rights and individual freedoms.


The HAARP project


Tom SPENCER (EPP, UK), chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said that the United States had been invited to state its viewpoint on this matter to the hearing. Although the US had declined an initial invitation, Mr SPENCER reiterated his offer, saying that the Americans could send a representative to address the committee in future if they wished.


Ms Rosalie BERTELL, from Toronto (Canada), is one of the best-informed experts about HAARP (the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme), a programme which has been developed by the US military.


She described the background to HAARP. The ionosphere is a high-altitude layer of the atmosphere with particles which are highly charged with energy. If radiation is projected into the ionosphere, huge amounts of energy can be generated and used to annihilate a given region.


The HAARP project involves the manipulation of the earth's ionosphere, whose natural role is to moderate energy transfer from the sun to the earth and is used as a missile trajectory and as a reflector for radio communication. The aim of HAARP is to control and manipulate the ionosphere so as to enable the manipulator to wipe out communications at will on a global scale, or to make them resilient in the event of a nuclear war.


It also enables communications to take place with submerged submarines and can, in theory, create geomagnetic pathways to guide particle beams which could then deposit large amounts of energy anywhere on the globe. In simpler terms, HAARP, with its power of intimidation, of delivery or denial of electrical energy on a global scale and its control of communications, is an element of a system which could control the global village in some frightening ways.


According to Dr Nick BEGICH, an expert from Alaska and author of one of the leading publications on the subject*, the HAARP programme would allow such concentrations of energy to be attained that an entire region of the planet could be deprived of water. Electromagnetic waves can cause earthquakes or tidal waves. Mr SPENCER pointed out that, under international conventions, any actions leading to climate change were prohibited.


Mr BEGICH said that in his eyes the project was purely and simply "Star Wars technology". Moreover, it was a secret project, as the US Congress had refused to finance Star Wars. The USA, he claimed, had allocated 91 million dollars to the main programme, to which must be added the related programmes. Over the last 50 years, he said, certain levels of security had been developed which were protected from public scrutiny. State secrets were acceptable in themselves but if they involved such major repercussions for human beings and the environment they must be made public. In his view, the international community should be allowed to evaluate the risks of the HAARP programme.


Eurico DE MELO (EPP, P) said he regarded the revelations as terrifying and said that there was a need for a campaign to inform the public about it.


Winding up, Magda AELVOET (Green, B) told the hearing that there was a saying: "War is too important to be left to the generals". She feared we had forgotten this truth.



Further information: Etienne BASSOT - tel. 284 47 41



* Angels Don't Play This Haarp, Advances in tesla technology, Earthpulse Press, USA, 1995


(8 votes)
Chemtr[1].januari.jpg
eind januari/februari 2006 Zuid Westelijke richting548 viewsNASA Confirms Weather-Shaping Chemtrails: www.mail-archive.com/chemtrailsarerealNASAConfirms

NASA: S-L-O-W To Spit Out The Truth
by Lisa Guliani


In the June 17, 2002 issue of the American Free Press newspaper, a bold headline caught my attention: "NASA Confirms Weather-Shaping Chemtrails". What?? Could it be? Do I dare believe my eyes? NASA is confirming that chemtrails are real? Naturally, I had to read this article written by Mike Blair.

You betcha, the good ole boys at NASA are FINALLY admitting what many of us already know and have been saying for quite some time - that chemtrails are not only REAL, but are also wreaking their deleterious effects on weather conditions. Well, whaddaya know? It must be a holiday or something. Gee, maybe if they REALLY try, they will even come across with the truth about HAARP someday in this lifetime. I can only dream.

If we assume the "glass-is-half-full" attitude, we might say that this sloooow admission is "progress" since governmental agencies have notoriously denied the existence of chemtrails despite Representative Dennis Kucinich legitimizing them in House Resolution 2977 as a form of "exotic weaponry" back in October, 2001. Sometimes I think if Jesus came down off the cross and declared that chemtrails are real, there would still be some moron to argue with Him about it. Duh.

The American Free Press article further states that NASA researchers (in all their wisdom, I'm sure) have even "concluded that this POLLUTION can create cirrus clouds." Did you read that, folks? NASA called chemtrails POLLUTION. Ahhh, maybe next time they'll grow a ball and call it just what it is - POISON. Moreover, NASA's Langley Research Center in Virginia went on to say that these artificially created cirrus clouds "have an impact on climate because they spread over large areas and effectively trap sunlight". Woohoo!! NASA began this latest bit of "research" after the events of 9/11/2001, so ten months of "study" and NASA has managed to officially connect the first dot or two. Bravo, fellas. It's nice to see ya catching up with the rest of us - finally.

Blair's article continues on to say NASA "came to its startling conclusions while conducting research while all NON-MILITARY aircraft were grounded" in the initial days following the events of September 11th. First of all, "startling conclusions?" Why is NASA startled at all? NASA has known about chemtrails all along. After all, isn't it NASA that obtained and holds the U.S. patent numbered 3813875? Why, YES, it is!!! Gee, maybe they forgot or something, ya think? They procured this patent in 1974. It is linked with a program that utilizes BARIUM for the purpose of creating ion clouds in our atmosphere. Fancy that. But NASA is "startled" to conclude that chemtrails are affecting our climate, eh?



(8 votes)
F-22AStealthBomberEdwardsAirForceBase.jpg
F22A Stealthbomber, Edwards Air Force Base201 views
(5 votes)
sportmodell.jpg
sport model479 views
(5 votes)
imagesCALT93SD.jpg
226 views
(5 votes)
120x60-blue.JPG
Media is the issue359 viewswww.freepress.net
(5 votes)
NASA1.jpg
The Secret NASA Transmissions365 viewsUFOs bewegen om de Tether STS-75...de UFOs rond deze satelliet kunnen volgens onderzoekers een diameter van 1 tot 3 mijlen hebben.

UFO ACTIVITY AROUND EARTH - See this footage: www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXWrP8mItgI&NR

UFOs ; Super advanced high QuantumTechnologies?!

Speed of Gravity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_gravity

(7 votes)
ufobama.jpg
US President Barack Obama - White House Inauguration Day Jan. 20th, 2008 Washington - UFO Surveillance-92 viewsNew UFO over Barrack Obama Speech in Hendersoon Nevada Nov. 1, 2008403 viewswww.theUFOstore.com/

UFO Hendersoon: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbn2ALh-2VA&feature=related

CNN LIVE - UFO Fly Over the Inauguration of Barack Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6jTAd-TVFM&feature=related

Obama to Disclose X-Files on Anti-Gravity Technology?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=NL&v=EjAVCYNdPi4

Will Obama Declassify X-Files on Anti-Gravity?
Countdown to May Day!
May 1, 2009 (Obama's 100th day in Office)
Will he do it???
It's not over YET!!!

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

http://www.ehow.com/how_2058482_write...

http://www.wikihow.com/Contact-the-Pr...

http://tinyurl.com/acp5uz

Does Obama have any real power? Or does a "Secret Government" maintain control over it?

.........

FAX: 202-456-2461
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

President Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500


Dear Mr. President,

I am writing you this letter in response to your recent decisions to probe deeper into anti-gravity technology and the so called "X-Files", which in all probably are hiding some amazing and beneficial technologies that I think the American people are more than ready for. In terms of the National Security Risk Factor associated with disclosing material related to the UFO/extraterrestrial phenomena, I want to point out that many of us already know the truth were just waiting for the Government to come forward and admit to it.

As an avid UFO researcher, I have come across a few things that I would really like your National Security and Intelligence team to probe deeper into:

1. NASA was ordered to hand over documents in response to a March 27, 2007 federal Court ruling by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (Case#1:03CV02509) regarding the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Leslie Kean. NASA is hiding documents and materials that were seized from a crash site in Kecksburg, PA on December 9, 1965.
(www.freedomofinfo.org/foi/complaint.pdf )

2. Former Area 51 employee and whistle blower Edgar Fouche says he worked on the Aurora Project for the US Military where he helped design the anti-gravity propulsion system for the TR3-b Flying Triangle which uses rotating mercury based plasma to achieve anti-gravity. The fundamental scientific principals behind this technology (anomalous effects of rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates) have been investigated by Boeings [GRASP], NASAs Advance Concepts Office, & NASAs Gravity Probe B.

Thank you for your time and dedicated service to the American people. Our thoughts and prayers are with you during this remarkable time.

Sincerely,

Your Name


Links:
Standard Letter Formatting:
http://www.cortland.edu/commguide/ima...

Biefeld-Brown Effect:
http://www.zamandayolculuk.com/cetinb...

Boston Examiner Articles by Dr. Michael Salla:

http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolu...


http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolu...


http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolu...


http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolu...

Join the Effort:
http://citizensbriefingbook.change.go...


(9 votes)
VoronezhSketches.jpg
Aliens landed in Voronezh Sept. 1989, Russian Federation363 viewsKlaatu, Giants & Anunna Androids: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ_saShscq8&feature=related

On 27th September,1989 according to young children of Voronezh ,South of Moscow they have seen a three-eyed alien with a robot escort -Similar to what we saw in latest movie "The Day the Earth Stood Still". The alien was said to be about nine foot tall. The craft, according to eye witness testimony, landed on the outskirts of the city. Shortly thereafter, the tall alien appeared, and upon seeing the young lad, shot a type of weapon at him, causing him to vanish before the eyes of the other people around him.

(8 votes)
1339 files on 9 page(s) 3